Skip to main content

Full text of "The Psycho Analytical Treatment Of Children"

See other formats


136.76 








Ar/ TIT 



136.76 F88p 



Keep Your Card in This Pocket 

Books will be issued only on presentation of proper 
library cards. 

Unless labeled otherwise, books may be retained 
for two weeks, Borrowers finding books marked, de- 
faced or mutilated are expected to report same at 
library desk; otherwise the last borrower will be held 
responsible for all imperfections discovered. 

The card holder is responsible for all books drawn 
on this card. 

Penalty for over-due books 2c a day plus cost of 
notices. 

Lost cards and change of residence must be re- 
ported promptly. 




Public Library 

Kansas City, Mo. 



TENSION ENVELOPE CORP. 



'4f 



'48 



'A 



THE 

TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 



THE PSYCHO-ANfAtYTlGAL 
TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 



Technical Lectures and Essays 

by 
ANNA FREUD 



Part I and II translated from the German 
by NANCY PROCTER-GREGG 



JMAGO PUBLISHING CO, LTD, 
LONDON 



in this form 1946 



PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY THE CHISWICK PRESS, NEW SOUTHGATE 

LONDON, N.I I 



Translator's Note 

For members of the teaching profession and parents who may have no par- 
ticular knowledge of psycho-analysis and its terminology, I venture to proffer 
here some very rough-and-ready explanations of the more technical terms, 
which are naturally used without elucidation in lectures addressed directly to 
practising analysts, but which might prove a stumbling block to a wider circle of 
readers. 

It will be appreciated that such explanations are strictly ad hoc , directed merely 
to the purpose of making this book more intelligible to the lay reader. No 
criticism of the conceptions embodied in the terms explained can justly- be 
founded on them; . brief notes of this kind upon the terminology of a young 
science cannot be framed in such a way as to stand examination directed to the 
premises of the science itself. 

I assume that the conception of "the unconscious" is nowadays fairly clear to 
most people. It is that highly active self within us of winch ex hypotkesi we are 
not directly aware. We are, of course, always aware of some (not all) of its acti- 
vities, even in sleep, when we dream. Repression is the process applied to im- 
pulses, notions, etc. unwelcome to our conscious selves, which we mean to, but 
cannot, discard; repression throws them, not into the discard (as we may have 
supposed until the analytical undoing of repression in the treatment of some con- 
sequential neurosis leads to their reappearance), but into the unconscious. 
Repression in this technical sense, i.e. "making unconscious," is naturally itself an 
unconscious process (though the movement towards rejection may not have been) 
and permits no memory of the occasion. 

The Id, the Ego and the Super- Ego are terms which to be properly understood, 
so far as understanding yet goes, require at least a book to themselves. They 
may very broadly be thought of, for the purpose of understanding these lectures, 
as respectively the unconscious, the conscious, and the "conscience" functions of 
the self. Both Ego and Super-ego dip deep into the unconscious, and should not 
be thought of as by any means entirely accessible to awareness. It is part of the 
theory of the super-ego that it is the internal judge of the self, which has deve- 
loped, largely unconsciously, from the "internalisation" of requirements and 
ideals to which the self at some period has given allegiance: usually those adum- 
brated by the parents, whether consciously or merely in the child's often dis- 
torting imagination. 

The "transference" is the very definite emotional attitude assumed by the 
patient, under the direction of his unconscious, in analysis towards the analyst; 



.TRANSLATOR s 

atfisjng, vesy.- rptT^lly:&pfealtiRg" From the fact that the analyst who re-elicits re- 
pressed reaqtigns^Jbecomes the representative of what originally occasioned either 
them or ttceityi^ession. 

The meaning of the other technical terms used will probably be deduced from 
their nomenclature or context. "Compulsion neurosis" is of course the common 
kind of mental maladjustment which so often takes a mild form in people who 
feel they cannot (or must) step on the cracks in the pavement. The latency period 
is that beginning usually about the fifth year of a child's life and lasting until 
' puberty; the child's early active and highly varied sexual impulses, connected 
with the various "erogenous zones" of the body affording gratification (ranging 
from the pleasures of sucking to those of anal activity, onanism etc.), become 
largely latent; the energy supplying them is to a great extent diverted. 

The Oedipus complex, to which so many sinister allusions are made by those 
who do not trouble or do not like to inform themselves of what they are talking 
about, is merely a handy, almost algebraical, way of denoting the whole set of 
feelings attached to the natural impulse of all children to crave for exclusive love, 
usually from the parent of the opposite sex. The myth of Oedipus, who un- 
knowingly carried the fulfilment of this instinct to its extreme, by killing his father 
and marrying his mother, stands conveniently for the whole complex of this wish, 
and its derivatives; which may (like any other desire which the individual may be 
unable to handle satisfactorily) lead to unhappy consequences when repressed 
into the unconscious. 

As for the function of analysis itself, a brilliant short exposition will be found 
in the fourth lecture (p. 38), in a passage which may be read with p*fefit before 
the book is begun. 



Table of Contents 

PAGE 



PREFACE 



PART i: INTRODUCTION TO THE TECHNIQUE OF THE 

ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN (1926) 3 

First Lecture: An Introductory Phase in the Analysis 
of Children.. 

Second Lecture: The Methods of Children's An- 
alysis. 

Third Lecture: The Role of Transference in the 
Analysis of Children. 

Fourth Lecture : The Analysis of Children and their 
Upbringing. 

PART II : THE THEORY OF CHILDREN'S ANALYSIS (1927) $ $ 

PART III: INDICATIONS FOR CHILD ANALYSIS (1945) 6j 

BIBLIOGRAPHY 95 



Preface 

Part I of this series comprises a course of lectures given in 1926 before 
the Vienna Institute of Psycho-Analysis under the title Introduction to 
the Technique of the Psycho- Analysis of Children (i). Part II, which 
slightly amplifies the subject matter treated in this introductory series 
of lectures, was, soon afterwards, read as a paper, at the Tenth Inter- 
national Psycho- Analytical Congress in Innsbruck, 1927 (2). Part III 
was written for The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child^ 1 945 (3), and 
attempts to summarise some of the advances in the understanding and 
evaluation of the infantile neurosis which the author has made in the 
intervening nineteen years of work on the subject. 

The audience of the first five lectures was, in each instance, composed 
of practising and prospective analysts, and accordingly both subject and 
phraseology of the main part of the book are technical. 

It is not the author's fault that the early material contained in this 
publication is presented to the English reader at such a late date. An 
English version of the Introduction to the Technique of Child- Analysis (4) 
was, published in America. Attempts at publication in England were 
not successful. For the general publisher the subject matter was still too 
remote and controversial. Professional psycho-analytical circles in 
England, on the other hand, were at that time concentrating their interest 
on Mrs. Melanie Klein's new theory and technique of the analysis of 
children (5). The British Psycho- Analytical Society devoted a Symposion 
on Child- Analysis (6) to a severe criticism of the author's efforts^ which 
ran counter to Mrs. Klein's outlook. The Introduction to the Technique 
of the Analysis of Children was rejected when offered to The Inter- 
national Psycho-Analytical Library for publication, and the matter 
lapsed, so far as England was concerned. 

In Vienna, from 1927 onward, a group of analysts, later joined by 
colleagues from Budapest and Prague, held regular meetings with the 
author to discuss the technique of the analysis of children, as it emerged 
from these introductory lectures, to report on cases which were treated 
with this method, to compare results, and to clarify the theoretical back- 
ground of the practical findings. The age range to which the technique 



was found applicable was lowered from the latency period, as originally 
suggested, to two years, and extended at the other end to pre-adolescence 
and adolescence. All types of non-organic disturbances of childhood 
development were taken into treatment, from the usual phobias, hysterical 
illnesses, obsessional disturbances, bed-wetting, stammering, compulsive 
masturbation and exhibitionism, neurotic constipation, to grave abnormal- 
ities of a schizophrenic type (7-30). Analyses of delinquent children were 
attempted and carried out, in close co-operation with the work of August 
Aichhorn on juvenile delinquency which was developed and taught by 
him in Vienna at the same time (31-34). 

Before these developments in the field of analytical therapy for children, 
Vienna had already been a fertile ground for the psycho-analytical study 
of normal child development, and for the application of this new know- 
ledge to education. Students of the subject had for years been listening to 
the inspiring lectures for teachers and youth leaders given by Siegfried 
Bernfeld (39-42), and many young and enthusiastic workers had taken 
part in his experiment in education in "Kinderheim Baumgarten", a 
camp school for homeless children which formed part of the American 
relief work for children in the post-war period after 1918. In 1929 the 
author was commissioned by the School Inspectorate of the City of 
Vienna to give four lectures on psycho-analysis to the teachers of the 
Children's Centres of the City (50). This marked a further step in the 
co-operation between psycho-analysis and education, which from then 
onward developed freely in all its branches. Some members of the Vienna 
Institute of Psycho- Analysis devoted a fair share of their teaching and 
lecturing activity to consolidating the, ground which had been gained. 
The Vienna Psycho-Analytic Society thus (besides training for the 
therapeutic analysis of neurotic and delinquent children) sponsored one 
Child Guidance Clinic for young children (directed by Edith Sterba), 
one Child Guidance Clinic for adolescents (directed by August Aichhorn) 5 
special discussion groups for teachers of the City who dealt with problem 
children in their own classrooms ; and, organised by Dr. W. Hoffer, a 
three years post graduate Training Course for teachers who received 
instruction in psycho-analytical child psychology, and guidance in its appli- 
cation to their handling of children (35-38, 43-68). To these ventures was 
added in 1937 an experimental Day-Nursery for infants between one 
and two years of age, which was founded and maintained by Dr. Edith 
Jackson, New Haven, and organised by the author in conjunction with 
Mrs. Dorothy Burlingham, and with themedical help of Dr. Josefine Stross. 



PREFACE XI 

So far as Vienna was concerned, these activities ended with the political 
changes in 1938. Nearly all the participants in the work left Austria, to 
continue elsewhere. Both sides of the work, the therapeutic as well as the 
one applied to education, were pursued further in the new surroundings. 
Members of the former Vienna Seminars for Children's Analysis joined 
up, in Holland or America, with other analytic colleagues to form similar 
seminars and discussion groups, or, as in England, continued the work 
among themselves. Analytic Child Study and work with educators was 
welcomed in all countries, for in the meantime interest in the problems 
of upbringing of normal and abnormal children had gradually Increased. 
Experimental Nurseries based on analytic principles came into being in 
Boston, Detroit and Los Angeles. The organisers of the Vienna Nursery, 
now in London founded and directed the so-called Hampstead Nurseries 
(69, 70), a Residential War Nursery, financed by the Foster Parents' Plan 
for War Children, Inc., New York, to which a three years' theoretical 
and practical Training Course for Children's Nurses and Teachers was 
attached. 

The extensive work done in psycho-analysis applied to education had 
in time its welcome repercussions on the therapeutic analysis of children, 
and led to important modifications on the technical side. In 1926, before 
there was any systematic teaching of either parents, teachers, or children's 
nurses, the author was justified in saying that the children's analyst must 
"claim for himself liberty to guide the child ..." (p. 45) and "accordingly 
combine in his own person two difficult and diametrically opposed func- 
tions: he has to analyse and educate, . . ." (p. 49). In 1946, after twenty 
years of intervening work with educators, such a statement is no longer 
legitimate. The children's analyst now shares his knowledge of the child's 
requirements with the workers in the field of education and upbringing, 
and accordingly his task has become easier. Whereas formerly he himself 
had to assume the "position of authority" (p. 45), he can now, with 
rare exceptions, concentrate his energies on the purely analytic side of 
the task, and count on the co-operation of enlightened parents, school 
teachers or nurses to supply the intelligent control and guidance of the 
child which are the indispensable accompaniment and counterpart of its 
analysis. 

For reasons of another kind, certain statements made in the First 
Lecture on An Introductory Phase in the Analysis of Children^ must be 
modified in the light of modern developments. In a study of the defence 
mechanisms of the ego (7), the author described ways and means to 



Xll PREFACE 

uncover and penetrate the first resistances in the analysis of children, 
whereby the introductory phase of the treatment is shortened and., in 
some instances, rendered unnecessary. Berta Bornstein, in a recent 
publication (7 2), gives a useful and well illustrated account of the technical 
changes in the analysis of children which arise from the study of their 
various defence mechanisms. 

The Second Lecture does not require similar modifications. The 
author's views on The Methods of Children's Analysis have to a large 
degree remained unchanged. 

The opinions expressed in the Third Lecture, on The Role of Trans- 
ference in the Analysis of Children^ have during the last twenty years been 
repeatedly opposed by children's analysts in England and America who 
maintain that the children under their treatment show profuse signs of 
transference which is open to analysis in the same manner as in the 
analysis of adult patients. The author fully agrees that this is the case. 
But, in spite of these manifold and variegated transferred reactions of the 
child, the author has not, so far, met a single case of a child patient where 
the original neurosis was given up during the treatment and replaced by 
a new neurotic formation in which the original objects had disappeared 
and the analyst taken their place in the patient's emotional life. It is only 
a structure of this kind which deserves the name of transference neurosis. 
So far as the author's experience goes, the letter occurs solely in cases of 
adult neurotics who are treated with the classical technique applicable 
only to patients who have reached maturity, 



PART I 

Introduction 

to the' Technique of 

the Analysis of Children 

(1926) 



FIRST LECTURE 
An Introductory Phase in the Analysis of Children 

Ladies and Gentlemen. It is difficult to assert anything about 
the technique of the analysis of children without first making 
clear one's position on the question : in which cases would one 
in general consider that an analysis should be undertaken, and 
in which would it be better to refrain? 

Mrs. Melanie Klein has as you know fully considered this 
question in her publications and in her lectures. She takes the 
view that any disturbance in the intellectual or other psycho- 
logical development of a child can be resolved or at least favour- 
ably influenced by an analysis. She goes still further, and main- 
tains that an analysis is of the greatest benefit also to the deve- 
lopment of a normal child, and in the fulness of time will become 
indispensable to complete all modern education. On the other 
hand, it transpired in the course of a discussion at one of 
our meetings last year that the majority of our Viennese 
analysts take a different point of view, and maintain that the 
analysis of a child is only appropriate in the case of an infantile 
neurosis. 

I am afraid that I am not going to be able to contribute much 
in the course of these lectures to the elucidation of this question. 
The most I can do is to give you an account of what cases I did 
undertake to analyse, and say in which of them this decision 
proved justified and in which the analysis came to grief owing 
to internal or external difficulties. It is natural that when one 
comes to make fresh decisions one is encouraged by a recent 
success and apt to be deterred by a failure. On the whole, I think 
one sometimes gets the impression in working with children 
that analysis is here a method too difficult, costly and com- 
plicated, that one does too much with it; contrariwise, in other 
cases, and that still more often, one feels that with pure analysis 
one accomplishes much too little, 



4 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

It may thus happen that analysis, where children are con- 
cerned, requires special modifications and adjustments, or 
indeed can only be undertaken subject to certain precautions. 
Where then the introduction of these precautions is impractic- 
able, the carrying out of an analysis may be inadvisable. 

In the course of these lectures you will see from manifold 
examples the application of the foregoing remarks. I shall on 
purpose leave for the present on one side any attempt to take 
this question further, and shall concern myself with the tech- 
nical process of the analysis of children in those cases where for 
some reason, which for the moment we shall not go into, it seems 
advisable to undertake that treatment. 

In the last year I have several times been invited to give a 
report of an analysis of a child at one of the technical courses of 
our Society, and to examine in that connection the special tech- 
nique of the analysis of children. Up to now I have always de- 
clined this request, for I was afraid that anything that one could 
say oh this subject must seem to you banal and obvious. The 
special technique of the analysis of children, in so far as it is 
special at all, derives from one very simple fact: that the adult 
is at least to a considerable degree a mature and independent 
being, while the child is immature and not self-dependent It is 
evident that to deal with such different subjects the method 
cannot remain uniform. Many of its elements, important and 
significant "in an adult case, lose their importance in the new 
situation ; the rdles of various expedients are shifted, and what 
was there a necessary and innocuous procedure becomes here 
perhaps risky. Such modifications however occur to everyone 
according to circumstances, and hardly require a special 
theoretical foundation. 

In the last two and a half years however I have had the oppor- 
tunity to conduct ten long analyses of children, and I shall try 
in what follows to arrange the observations which I was enabled 
to make in the way in which they would probably have im- 
pressed anyone amongst you under equally favourable cir- 
cumstances. 

We shall accordingly keep to the actual sequence of events 
as they occur in an analysis, and begin with the attitude of the 
child at the outset of the analytical work, 



AN INTRODUCTORY PHASE 

Let us consider first the analogous situation with an adult 
patient. A person feels that he is disturbed, in his work or his 
enjoyment of life, by some sort of difficulty within himself; he 
gains on one ground or another, confidence in the therapeutical 
power of analysis or of some particular analyst; and he makes 
the decision to seek a remedy by this means. I know of course 
that the facts are not always altogether like this. It is not always 
exclusively the inner difficulties which are the motive for the 
analysis frequently this is only provided by the conflicts with 
environment which arise from them. Again, the decision is not 
always made really independently; pressure from relatives or 
others often plays a rdle greater than is favourable for the later 
progress of the work. Nor is confidence in analysis and the 
analyst always a factor. But still it always remains for the treat- 
ment the wished-for and ideal situation, that the patient should 
of his own free will ally himself with the analyst against a part 
of his inward being. 

This state of things is naturally never to be found amongst 
children. The decision for analysis never comes from the child 
who is to be the patient, but always from the parents or other 
persons round it. The child is not asked for its consent. If the 
question were put to it, it couldjiardly pronounce an opinion or 
find an answer. The analyst is a stranger, analysis itself some- 
thing unknown. 

But what constitutes an even greater difficulty is that in 
many cases the child itself is not the sufferer, for it often does not 
perceive the trouble in itself at all; only the persons round it 
suffer from its symptoms or outbreaks of naughtiness. And so 
the situation lacks everything which seems indispensable in the 
case of the adult: insight into the malady, voluntary decision, 
and the will towards cure. 

This does not impress every analyst of children 'as a serious 
obstacle. You will be aware from Mrs. Melanie Klein's writings 
how she comes to terms with these circumstances and what 
technique she founds on them. To me, on the contrary, it seems 
that one ought to try whether one cannot produce in the child's 
case, too, the situatipn which has proved so favourable in the 
adult's, that- is to say, whether one cannot induce in the child in 
$ome way the missing readiness and willingness, 



6 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

I shall make it the subject of my first lecture to show you how 
in six different cases, of ages between six and eleven, I succeeded 
in making the small patient "analysable" in the sense of the 
adult, that is to say inducing an insight into the trouble, im- 
parting confidence in the analyst, and turning the decision for 
analysis from one taken by others into its own. Children's 
analysis requires for this task a preparatory period which does 
not occur with adults. I must emphasize that everything which 
we undertake in this period has nothing to do with the real 
analytical work, that is to say there is as yet no question 
of making unconscious processes conscious or of analytical 
influence on the patient. It is simply a matter of converting an 
unsuitable situation into a desirable one, by all the means which 
are at the disposal of an adult dealing with a child. This time 
of preparation the "dressage" for analysis one might properly 
call it will last the longer, the further the original condition 
of the child is from that of the ideal adult patient which has 
already been described. 

Such a task need not moreover always be very difficult; the 
step which has to be taken is often not a specially big one. I am 
reminded of the case of a little six-year-old girl who was sent to 
me last year for three weeks* observation. I had to determine 
whether the difficult, silent and unpleasing nature of the child 
was due to a defective disposition and unsatisfactory intellectual 
development, or whether we had here a case of an especially 
inhibited and dreamy child. Closer observation revealed the 
presence of a compulsion neurosis, unusually severe and well- 
defined for such an early age, together with acute intelligence 
and keen logical powers. In this case the introductory process 
proved very simple. The little girl' already knew two children 
who were being analysed by me, and she came the first time to 
the appointment with her slightly older friend. I said nothing 
special to her, and merely left her to gain a little confidence in 
the strange surroundings. The next time, when I had her alone, 
I made the first attack. I said that she knew quite well why her 
two friends came to me, one because he could never tell the 
truth and wanted to give up this habit, and the other because 
she cried so often and was angry with herself for doing so; and 
I wondered whether she too had been sent to me for some such 



AN INTRODUCTORY PHASfi 7 

reason. At that she said quite frankly "I have a devil in me. 
Can it be taken out?" 

I was for a moment taken aback at this unexpected answer. 
Certainly it could, I said, but it would be no light work. And if 
I were to try with her to do it, she would have to do a lot of things 
which she would not find at all agreeable. (I meant of course 
that she would have to tell me everything). 

She had a moment or two of earnest meditation, then she 
replied ,"If you tell me that it is the only way to do it, and to 
do it quickly, then I shall do it that way/' Thereby of her own 
free will she bound herself by the essential rule of analysis. We 
ask nothing more of an adult patient at the outset. But further, 
she fully understood the question of the length of time neces- 
sary. When the three trial weeks were up her" parents were 
undecided whether to leave her under analysis with me or to 
put her under other care. She herself however was very dis- 
quieted, not wanting to give up the hope awakened while with 
me that she would be cured, and kept insistently demanding 
that if she had to go I should rid her of her devil in the three or 
four days remaining. I assured her that this was impossible and 
that it would take a long time of working together. I could not 
make this intelligible to her with numbers, for although she was 
already of school age, on account of her numerous inhibitions 
she had as yet no knowledge of arithmetic. Thereupon she sat 
herself down on the floor, pointed at the pattern of my carpet, 
and said,"Will it take as many days as there are red bits? Or 
even as many as the green bits?" I showed her the great number 
of appointments that would be necessary by referring to the 
many medallions in the pattern. She fully grasped the point, 
and in the imminent decision did her part in persuading her 
parents of the necessity for a very long time of working with me. 

You may say that in this case it was the gravity of the neurosis 
which lightened the work of the analyst. But I think that would 
be a mistake. I will give you an example of another case in which 
the introductory phase took a similar course, although there 
could have been no question of a real neurosis at all. 

About two and a half years ago I made the analytical ac- 
quaintance of a difficult little girl of nearly eleven. She was 
from the well-to-do Viennese middle-class, but the relationships 



8 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT, OF CHILDREN 

in her home were unfavourable, for her father was weak and 
little concerned with her, the mother had been dead for some 
years, and her relationship with the father's second wife and a 
younger step-brother was unsatisfactory. A number of thefts 
by the child, and an unending series of crude lies and small and 
great concealments and insincerities had determined the step- 
mother, on the advice of the family physician, to seek the aid 
of analysis. Here the analytical treaty was equally simple, 
"Your parents cannot do anything with you," was the 'basis of 
the negotiations, "with their help alone you will never get out 
of the constant scenes and conflicts. Perhaps you will try the 
help of a stranger/' She accepted me without more ado as an 
ally against her parents, just as the little compulsion-neurotic 
I described before did against her devil. The insight into the 
malady of the compulsion-neurotic was here clearly replaced 
by insight into the conflict; the factor actually common to both 
however was the amount of suffering, which in the first case 
sprang from inward causes and in the second from outer. 

My next procedure in this second case was throughout that 
recommended by Aichhorn for the educational treatment of 
delinquent children. The probation officer entrusted with the 
case of such children, says Aichhorn, must first of all put him- 
self on the side of the delinquent, and assume that the child is 
justified in its attitude to those about it. Only so will he succeed 
in working with his charge instead of against him. I might 
emphasize here that Aichhorn's position for this kind of work 
has considerable advantage over that of the Analyst. He is 
authorised to interfere by the state or town, and he has behind 
him the authority of an official position. The analyst on the 
contrary, as the child knows, is commissioned and perhaps paid 
by the parents, and he always gets into an awkward position if 
he sets himself against his clients, even if it is in their own 
interest. In fact I never held the necessary consultations with 
this child's parents without feeling uneasy, and the analysis 
after some weeks, in spite of the best inherent conditions, 
finally came to grief on account of this unclarified relationship. 

In these two cases at all events the preliminaries necessary 
for the beginning of a real analysis, the sense of suffering, con- 
fidence in analysis and decision in favour of it, were created 



AN INTRODUCTORY PHASE y 

with little trouble. Let us now go to the other extreme, and 
consider a case in which none of these three factors was present. 

This was a ten-year-old boy with an obscure mixture of many 
anxieties, nervous states, insincerities and childish perverse 
habits,. Various small and one more serious theft had occurred 
in recent years. The conflict with his home surroundings was 
no open and conscious one, and on the surface any insight into 
his very uncomfortable condition, or any wish to change it, was 
not to be found. His attitude to me was one of thorough-going 
rejection and mistrust, his whole endeavour being directed to 
protecting his sexual secrets'from discovery. Here I could not 
employ either of the two expedients which had proved feasible 
in the other two cases. I could neither ally myself with his 
conscious Ego against a split-off part of his nature (for he felt 
nothing of such a division), nor offer myself as a partner against 
his surroundings, to which so far as he was consciously aware 
he was attached by the strongest feelings. I clearly had to take 
another course, more difficult and less direct, for it was a 
question of creeping into a confidence which was not to be won 
directly, and forcing myself upon a person who was of the 
opinion that he could do very well without me. 

I tried to do this in various ways. At first, for a long time, I 
did nothing but follow his moods and humours along all their 
paths and bypaths. Did he come to his appointment in a 
cheerful disposition, I was cheerful too; if he were serious or 
depressed, I was the same. Did he prefer, instead of moving 
about or sitting or lying down, to spend the hour under the 
table, I would treat it as the most natural thing in the world and 
hold up the tablecloth and speak to him under it. If he came 
with string in. his pocket, and began to show me remarkable 
knots and tricks, I would let him see that I could make more 
complicated knots and do more remarkable tricks. If he made 
faces, I pulled better ones, and if he challenged me to trials of 
strength I showed myself incomparably stronger. But I fol- 
lowed his lead in every subject of talk, from tales of pirates and 
questions of geography to stamp-collections and love stories. 
In these conversations nothing was too grown-up or too delicate 
a subject for me to talk to him about, and not even his mistrust- 
fulness could suspect an educational intention behind what I 



IO THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

said. My way was rather like that of a film or novel which has no 
other intention than to attract the audience or reader to itself, and 
with this aim concentrates on the interests and needs of its 
public. My first aim was in fact nothing else but to make myself 
interesting to the boy. That in this first period I became 
familiar at the same time with many of his interests and inclina- 
tions which lay near the surface was an accessory advantage. 

After a time I brought in another factor. I proved myself 
useful to him in small ways, wrote letters for him on the type- 
writer during his visits, was ready to help him with the writing 
down of his daydreams and self-invented stories of which he 
was proud, and made all sorts of little things for him during his 
hour with me. In the case of a little girl who was undergoing 
her preparation at the same time I zealously crochetted and 
knitted during her appointments, and gradually clothed all 
her dolls and teddy bears. 

To put it briefly, I developed in this way a second agreeable 
quality I was not only interesting, I had become useful. As 
an accessory gain in this second period I had by means of the 
letter and story writing obtained an introduction into the sphere 
of his acquaintance and his fantasies. 

Then however came something incomparably more impor- 
tant. I made him notice that being analysed has very great 
practical advantages, that for example punishable deeds have an 
altogether different and much more fortunate result when they 
are first told to the analyst, and only through him to those in 
charge of the child. And thus he got the habit of relying on 
analysis as a protection from punishment and claiming my 
help for repairing the consequences of his rash acts; he let me 
restore stolen money in his place and got me to .make all neces- 
sary but disagreable confessions to his parents. He tested my 
abilities in this direction over and over again before he decided 
really to believe in them. After that however there were no 
more doubts ; besides an interesting and useful companion I had 
become a very powerful person, without whose help he could 
no longer get along. Thus in these three capacities I had made 
myself indispensable to him. He was now in full dependence 
and in a transference relationship. I had however only waited 
for this moment to require of him in return not in terms and 



AN INTRODUCTORY PHASE ti 

not all at one stroke very energetic and comprehensive co- 
operation; namely the surrender,, so necessary for analysis, of 
all his previously guarded secrets, which then took up the next 
weeks and months and with which the real analysis first began. 

You observe that in this case I concerned myself not at all 
with the establishment of insight into the malady, which in 
later progress came of itself in quite a different way; here the 
problem was only the creation of a tie between us, which must 
be strong enough to sustain the later analysis. 

But I fear from this detailed description you may think that 
there was nothing at stake but this tie. I will try to reduce this 
impression with the help of other examples which hold a middle 
course between the two extremes I have mentioned. 

I was called upon to analyse another ten-year-old boy, who 
had recently developed a symptom which was very unpleasant 
and disturbing to those about him, namely noisy outbursts of 
rage and naughtiness, which broke out for no intelligible out- 
ward reason and were very strange in this otherwise inhibited 
and timid child. It was easy in this case to gain his confidence, 
for I was already known to him. The decision for analysis har- 
monised too with his own intentions^ for his younger sister was 
already my patient, and jealousy of the advantages of her 
position in the family which she clearly derived from this fact 
made his wishes turn in the same direction. In spite of this I 
found no direct point of attack for the analysis; but the explana- 
tion was not far to seek. He had indeed so far as his anxiety was 
concerned a partial insight into the malady, and a certain desire 
to get rid of it and of his inhibitions. But for his main symptom, 
the rages, it was rather the contrary, Of them he was unmistak- 
ably proud, regarding them as something which distinguished 
him from others (if indeed not directlyin afavourablesense), and 
he enj oyed the worry they caused his parents. He thus felt himself 
in a certain sense at one with this symptom, and would probably 
at that time have resisted any attempt to rid him of it with 
analytical help. But here I ambushed him in a not very honest 
way, I resolved to embroil him with that part of his nature, I 
made him describe the outbreaks as often as they came and 
showed myself concerned and thoughtful. I enquired how far 
in such states he was yet master of his action at all, and compared 



12 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

his fits of rage to those of a madman who would be beyond my 
aid. At that he was startled and rather frightened, for to be re- 
garded as mad naturally did not chime with his ambitions. He 
now tried himself to master these outbreaks, began to resist 
them instead of as earlier to encourage them ; thereby he noticed 
his real lack of strength to suppress them and so felt an enhance- 
ment of his feelings of suffering and discomfort. After a few vain 
attempts the symptom finally, as I had intended, turned from a 
treasured possession into a disturbing foreign body,, to fight 
which he only too readily claimed my help. 

It will strike you that in this case I induced a condition which 
had been present from the beginning in the little compulsion- 
neurotic ; a split in the child's inner being. In yet another case, 
of a seven-year-old neurotically naughty little girl, I determined 
on the same artifice at the end of a long preparatory period 
similar to those already described. I suddenly separated offall her 
naughtiness and personified it before her, giving it a name of its 
own and confronting her with it, and even tually succeeded i n s o far 
that she began to complain of the person thus newly created by 
me, and obtained an insight into the amount of suffering she had 
endured from it. The "analysability" of the child came hand in 
hand with the insight into the malady established in this way. 

But we must not forget another limitation. I once analysed 
an unusually gifted and sensitive little girl who cried too easily. 
She wanted very much to get over this tendency with the help 
of analysis. But the work with me always stuck at a certain stage, 
and I was on the point of contenting myself with a minor 
amelioration. At that point there emerged clearly as an ob- 
struction a tender attachment to a nurse, who was not friendly 
towards analysis; and our efforts, as they really came to pene- 
trating the depths, struck upon it. The* child indeed believed 
me as to what emerged from the analysis and what I said, but 
only up to a certain point a stage to which she had allowed 
herself to go and where her loyalty to the nurse began. What- 
ever went beyond it struck upon a tenacious and unassailable 
resistance. She regressed in fact to an old conflict in the love- 
choice between her parents who lived apart, which had played 
an important role in her early childhood development. But 
this disclosure again did not really help, for the recent attach- 



AN INTRODUCTORY PHASE i^ 

ment to the person of her nurse was a thoroughly real and well- 
founded one. 

Then I began a keen and sustained battle with the nurse 
for the child's affection, conducted on both sides with every 
-possible expedient; in it I awakened her criticism, tried to 
shake her blind dependence, and turned to my account every 
one of the little conflicts which occur daily in a nursery. I knew 
that I had won, when one day the little girl told me again the 
story of such an incident which had affected her at home, but 
this time added "Do you think she's right?" Only from then 
on could the analysis penetrate the depths, and it led to the most 
promising result of all the cases I have mentioned. 

The decision as to whether this method, the battle for the 
child itself, is permissible was in this case made without diffi- 
culty; the nurse's influence would have been bad not only for 
the analysis but for the whole development of the child. But 
consider how impossible such a situation is when one has as an 
opponent no stranger but the child's parents, or when one is 
faced with the question of whether it is worth depriving the 
child, in the interests of a successful analysis, of someone's 
really favourable and desirable influence. We shall return to 
this point in more detail when we consider the question of .the 
prospects of the analysis of children and the relationship with 
the child's environment. 

I shall conclude this subject with two more little stories, 
meant to show you how far the child is able to grasp the meaning 
of analytical work and of the therapeutical problem. 

The best of them comes from the case of the little compul- 
sion-neurotic. She recounted to me one day an unusually well- 
sustained battle with her devil, and suddenly demanded appre- 
ciation. "Anna Freud," she said, "am I not much stronger than 
my devil? Can't I control him very well by myself? I don't 
think I need you for it at all." I fully confirmed that. She was 
really much stronger, and without my help. "But I do need 
you," she said after pondering for a minute, "you have to help, 
me not to be so unhappy at having to be stronger than it?' I 
think that even from a grown-up neurotic one can expect no 
better understanding of the change he hopes for from analysis. 

And now for the second story. My naughty ten-year-old 



14 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

whom I have already described in detail, in a later period of his 
analysis got into conversation one day in the waiting room with 
one of my father's adult patients. This man told him about his 
dog, which had killed a fowl for which he, the owner, had had to 
pay. "The dog ought to be sent to Freud," said my little patient, 
"he needs analysis. " The grown-up did not reply, but after- 
wards showed great disapproval. What odd sort of idea of 
analysis did the child have? The dog had nothing the matter 
with it; it wanted to kill the hen and it killed it. I knew exactly 
what the boy had meant. "The poor dog," he must have 
thought, "he wants so badly to be a good dog and something in- 
side him forces him to kill hens." 

As you see, insight into naughtiness had in the little neurotic 
delinquent shifted without difficulty into the place of insight 
into the malady, and, thus provided a fully sufficient motive for 
analysis. 



SECOND LECTURE 
The Methods of Children's Analysts 

Ladies and Gentlemen. I apprehend that my recent account 
of myself will have left an odd impression upon those among 
you who are practising analysts. My proceedings altogether, 
as I presented them to you, contradict at too many points the 
rules for the technique of psychoanalysis as laid down for us 
in the past. 

Let us review once more the various things I did: 

I gave the little girl a positive promise of cure, bearing 
in mind the consideration that one cannot demand of a child 
that with one who was previously a stranger it should follow 
an unknown path to an uncertain end; I fulfilled in this way 
her apparent desire to be compelled by authority and wrapped 
in security. I openly offered myself as an ally, and joined the 
child in criticising its parents. 

In another case I embarked on a secret struggle with the 
home circle, and courted the child's affections in all possible 
ways. 

To achieve my aim I exaggerated the possible gravity of a 
symptom, and frightened the patient. 

And finally I crept into the children's confidence, and 
obtruded upon individuals who were firmly of the opinion 
that they could do very well without me. 

Where in all this is the delicate restraint prescribed for the 
analyst; the prudence with which one holds out to the patient 
an uncertain prospect of the possibility of cure, or merely of 
amelioration; the scrupulous discretion in all personal matters; 
the absolute frankness in reviewing the malady; and the full 
freedom which one gives the patient to break off the mutual 
work whenever he likes of his own accord? 

I must defend myself against the suspicion which has 
perhaps arisen in you, that I proceeded as I did in ignorance or 



1 6 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

unintentional neglect of the prescribed rules. I maintain that 
I simply elaborated, to suit anew situation, the elements of an 
attitude which without stressing it particularly you all adopt 
in dealing with your patients. 

Perhaps in my first lecture I exaggerated the difference 
between the child's initial situation and that of the adult. You 
know how insecure in the early days of an analysis seem the 
maintenance of resolution and the patient's confidence. We 
are in danger of losing him before he has begun the analysis at 
all, and we only feel that our proceedings are on sure ground 
when we have him firmly in the transference relation. In these 
first days however we work upon him, almost imperceptibly 
and without noticing that we are taking any special pains, in 
a number of ways which are not so very different from my 
laborious and apparently distinctive methods with children. 

Take for example a melancholic patient. It is true that 
analytical therapy and technique are not directly designed for 
such cases, but if one is undertaken a preparatory period of 
this kind must be inserted, in which the patient's interest and 
resolution for the analytical work is awakened by the analyst's 
sympathy and by his entering into his personal needs. 

Or take another case. Technical precepts warn us, as you 
know, against interpreting dreams too early and thereby 
offering the patient knowledge of his inner processes which he 
can only reject instead of understanding. But with, an intelligent 
and educated compulsion neurotic who doubts everything, we 
may be glad to be able to offer him, at the very outset of the 
treatment, an especially happy and impressive dream-inter- 
pretation. Thereby we interest him and satisfy his exacting 
intellectual demands and at bottom we are doing nothing 
else but what the children's analyst does, when he shows a 
boy that he can do much cleverer tricks with a piece of string 
than he can himself. 

Another analogy is to be found in the way in which we 
show ourselves to be on the side of the rebellious and delinquent 
child and ready to help him against his world. We show the 
adult neurotic too that we are there to help and support him, 
and we take his part exclusively in all conflicts with his family; 
proving ourselves thus to be useful. 



THE METHODS OF CHILDREN S ANALYSIS I 7 

Moreover the factor of power and external authority plays a 
part. Observation shows that the experienced analyst with a 
reputation finds it much easier to hold his patient and to save 
him from 4 'absconding" in the early stages than the young 
beginner; and towards him less "negative transference" and 
indications of hostility and mistrust are evinced. We ascribe 
this difference to the young analyst's inexperience, his lack of 
tact in his demeanour towards the patient, his precipitation or 
over-caution in interpretation. But I believe that just here 
one should take into account the factor of external authority. 
The patient asks himself, not without reason, who this man is 
after all, who suddenly claims to exercise such prodigious 
authority over him; and whether his claims are justified by his 
position in the world and the attitude of other, normal, people 
towards him. This is not necessarily a matter of the recrudes- 
cence of old hostile impulses, but rather perhaps a stirring of 
critical commonsense before the patient lets himself slide into 
the analytical transference situation. But the eminent analyst 
with a name and position obviously enjoys, by virtue of the 
esteem in which he is held, the same advantages as the children's 
analyst, who in any case is bigger and older than his little 
patient, and who becomes a person of undoubted power when 
the child feels that his authority is put by the parents even 
higher than their own. 

Thus these features might be regarded as the elements of an 
introductory phase of the treatment, such as I have already 
described, with adults as well as children. But I think I am ex- 
pressing myself on this incorrectly. It would be more appro- 
priate to say that in the technique of the analysis of adults we 
find vestiges of all the expedients which prove necessary with 
children. The extent to which we use them will depend upon 
how far the adult patient with whom we are dealing is still an 
immature and dependent being, approximating in this respect 
to a child. 

So much for the introductory phase to the treatment, the 
establishment of the analytical situation. In what follows let us 
suppose that the child, by all the foregoing means, has really 
won confidence in the analyst, possesses insight into the malady 
and is now striving of its own accord for a change in its condition. 



1 8 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

So we come to our second theme an examination of the means 
at our disposal with a child for the analytical work proper. 

In the technique of analysis of adults we have four such ex- 
pedients, We turn to account ^nyS!ir!g which the patient's 

for the establishment of as com- 

Mf*iVf'f a0afn '*''* 3 ' fr< ^ >fa} ' 



M _ alf , Mt ^Mf*iVf'f 

plete a hisJmiLI)J[ his malady as possiDl^r*^"^SpK)y dream 

1^^^ r / ^m^ama^m^ 

mJerpretai^JLpn ; we assess and interpret the ideas brought up by 
the patient's free^sooatipn; and finally through the inter- 
pretation of his jtr^sf^jp^e^react^ns we obtain access to all 
those parts of his past life which can be translated into con- 
sciousness in no other way. I must inflict upon you in what fol- 
lows a systematic examination of these expedients in their 
applicability to and utility for the analysis of children. 

In the construction of the case history from the patient's 
conscious memories we come across the first difference. In 
adult cases, as you know, we refrain from bringing in any in- 
formation at all from the patient's family and rely entirely upon 
what he can tell us himself. This voluntary restriction is based 
on the fact that communications imparted by the relatives are 
apt to be unreliable and incomplete,, and take their colour from 
the relatives^personal attitude towards the sufferer, 
cannQtcontribute much tojhejys^r^nt^^alady. 

i^jfiJLp^ ^ oes *lLiS!lJ5^^^" 

It is so talcen xTjJlvft^^ 

parison. Besides, it does not 'know itself when its abnormality 
began and when its nature first appeared to be different from 
that of other children. It has as yet little notion of comparing 
itself with others, and still less of self-appointed tasks by which 
it can measure its failures. Thus a children's analyst must in 
practice take the case history from the patient's parents. There 
is nothing else for it but to make all possible allowance for in- 
accuracies and misrepresentations arising from personal 
motives. 

Contrariwise, we have in dream^Jjiterpr^tion a field in 
which ffieaafiuJ^ 

an^j^sii^ adults. During analysis the child dreams neither less 
nor more tKan the grown up, the transparency or obscurity of 
the dream content conforms as in the case of adults to the 
strength of the resistance. Children's dreams are certainly 



THE METHODS OF CHILDREN'S ANALYSIS 19 

easier to interpret, if indeed they are not always so simple as the 
examples given in The Interpretation of Dreams, We find in 
them every such distortion of wish-fulfilment as corresponds to 
the complicated neurotic organisation of the childish patient. 
But there is nothing easier to make the child grasp than dream 
interpretation. At the first account of a dream, I say "No dream 
can make itself out of nothing; it must have fetched every bit 
from somewhere" and then I set off with the child in search 
of its origins. The child amuses itself with the pursuit of the 
individual dream elements as with a jigsaw puzzle, and follows 
up the separate images or words into real life situations with 
great satisfaction. Perhaps this comes about because the child 
still stands nearer to dreams than the adult; it may again be 
merely because it feels no surprise to find a meaning in dreams, 
not having heard the view that they have no meaning. In any 
case it is proud of a successful dream interpretation. And 
moreover I have often found that even unintelligent children, 
who in all other points were as inapt as possible for analysis, did 
not fail in dream-interpretation. I have conducted two such 
analyses for an extended period almost exclusively by using 
dreams. 

But even where the associations to the child's dreams fail to 
appear, an interpretation is nevertheless often still possible. It 
is so much easier to know the child's situation, the daily hap- 
penings and significant people in its life. Often one may venture 
to insert the missing ideas into the interpretation from one's 
own knowledge of the situation. The two following examples of 
children's dreams, will merely serve to illustrate these circum- 
stances. 

In the fifth month of the analysis of a nine-year-old girl I 
eventually arrived at the discussion of her masturbation, which 
she could only admit even to herself with a strong feeling of 
guilt. She felt very hot sensations when masturbating, and her 
revulsion against her handling of her genitals extended to these 
feelings. She began to be afraid of fire and rebelled against 
wearing warm clothes. She could not see the flame burning in a 
gas water heater next her bedroom without fearing an explosion. 
One evening when the mother was away the nurse wanted to 
light the heater, but did not know how and called the elder 



1O THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

brother to help. But he did not know how either. The little girl 
stood by and had the feeling that she ought to know how. The 
following night she dreamed of the same situation,, but in the 
dream she actually did help., but did it wrong and the heater ex- 
ploded. As a punishment the nurse held her in the fire so that she 
would burn up. She woke up in a great state of anxiety and 
awakened her moth'er at once to tell her the dream, adding 
(from her analytical knowledge) that it was certainly a punish- 
ment dream. She brought up no other ideas, but I could easily 
supply them in this case. Manipulating the heater stood for 
manipulating her own body, which she assumed her brother 
did too. "Doing it wrong" was the expression of her own con- 
demnation, and the explosion probably represented her form of 
orgasm. The nurse, who was the natural person to admonish 
against masturbation, appropriately carried out the punishment. 

Two months later she had another fire-dream with the fol- 
lowing content : ' * On the radiator there were two bricks of different 
colours. I knew that the house was going to catch fire and I was 
frightened. Then somebody came and took the bricks away" When 
she woke up she had her hand on her genitals. 

This time she associated an idea to a part of the dream, the 
bricks; she had been told that if you put bricks on your head 
you do not grow. From that the interpretation could be com- 
pleted without difficulty. Stopping growing was one of the 
punishments for masturbation which she feared, and we recog- 
nised the significance of fire as a symbol of her sexual excitation 
from the earlier dream. Thus she masturbated in her sleep, was 
warned by the remembrance of all the prohibitions, and was 
frightened. The unknown person who took away the bricks was 
probably myself, with my soothing reassurances. 

Not all dreams occurring in the analysis of children present 
so few difficulties in interpretation. But on the whole my little 
compulsion neurotic was right when she would announce to 
me a dream of the preceding night as follows: "To-day I have a 
funny dream to tell you, but you and I will soon find out what it 
all means." 

The interpretation of daydreams as well as of ordinary 
dreams plays an important part in the analysis of children. 
Several of the children with whom I gained my experience were 



THE METHODS OF CHILDREN S ANALYSIS 21 

great daydreamers, and the retailing of their fantasies became 
of the greatest assistance to me in analysis. It is usually very 
easy to induce children to recount their daydreams, once one has 
gained their confidence in other matters. They tell them more 
readily and are clearly less ashamed of them than adults, who 
condemn daydreaming as "childish." While the adult, from 
these considerations of shame and condemnation, usually only 
brings his daydreams into the analysis at a late stage and hesitat- 
ingly, in a child's analysis their appearance is often of great 
assistance in the difficult early stages. The following examples 
will give you three types of such fantasies. 

The simplest type is the daydream as a reaction to an ex- 
perience in the day. The little girl for example, whose dreams I 
have just mentioned, at the time when competition with her 
brothers and sisters was playing a part of great importance in 
her analysis, reacted to a supposed slight setback with the fol- 
lowing daydream : "/ wish I had never come info the world at all, 
I wish I could die. Sometimes I pretend I do die, and then come lack 
into the world as an animal or a doll. But if I do come back into the 
world as a doll, I know who I mean to belong to a little girl that my 
nurse was with before, who is specially nice and good. I want to be 
her doll and I would not mind at all being treated like they treat dolls. 
I would be a dear little baby and they could wash me and do anything 
to me. The little girl would like me best qf all. Perhaps she would get 
another doll for Christmas but I would still be her favourite. She 
would never prefer any doll to the baby doll" It is superfluous to 
add that of her brothers and sisters the two of whom she was 
particularly jealous were younger than her. Her current situa- 
tion could not find clearer expression in any account or associa- 
tion than it did in this little fantasy. 

The six-year-old compulsion neurotic lived at the beginning 
of her analysis with friends of her family. She had one of 
her fits of naughtiness, which was much criticised by the 
other children. Her little girl friend even refused to sleep 
in the same room with her, which upset her very much. 
.She told me in the analysis however that she had been good, 
that the nurse had given her a present of a little toy rabbit, and 
assured me at the same time that the other children liked sleep- 
ing-with her very much. Then she recounted a daydream which 



22 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

she had suddenly had while she was resting. She had not felt at 
all that she was making it up. "Once upon a time there was a little 
rabbit^ whose family were not at all nice to him. They were going to 
send him to the slaughterhouse and have him slaughtered. But he 
found it out. He had a car which was very old but could still be 
driven. He went for it at night and got in and drove away. He came 
to a dear little house in which a little girl (here she used her own 
name) lived. She heard him crying downstairs and came down and 
let him in. Then he stayed to live with her." Here the feeling of 
not being wanted, which she would willingly be spared both in 
my eyes and her own, shows itself quite transparently. She 
herself is twice present in the daydream as the little unloved 
rabbit and as the little girl who treats him as well as she herself 
would like to be treated. 

A more complicated second type is the continued daydream. 

With children who compose such "serial story" daydreams 
it is often very easy to get on such terms that even in the earliest 
part of the analysis they will daily retail the new instalment. 
The current inward situation of the child can be reconstructed 
from these day-by-day continuations. 

As an example of a third type I will mention a nine-year-old 
boy, whose daydreams, though certainly constructed with 
varying people and circumstances, repeated in innumerable 
situations the same outcome. He began his analysis with the 
narration of an abundance of such stored-up fantasies. In many 
of them the two principal personages were a hero and a king. 
The king threatened the hero, wanting to torture and slay him, 
and the hero escaped him in all possible ways. All technical 
inventions, especially an air fleet, played a great part in the 
pursuit. A cutting machine, which sent out sickle-like knives on 
each side when in motion, was also of great importance^ The 
fantasy ended with the hero victorious, and doing everything to 
the king which the king wanted to do to him. Another of his 
daydreams depicted a teacher who punished and beat the 
children. The children eventually surrounded and overpowered 
her, and beat her to death. Still another had to do with a whip- 
ping-machine, in which in the end the torturer was locked in- 
stead of the captive for whom it was intended. He still possessed 
in his memory a whole collection of such fantasies with endless 



THE METHODS OF CHILDREN S ANALYSIS 23 

variations. Without knowing anything more about the boy we 
can divine that all these fantasies are based on the defence against 
and revenge for a castration-threat; that is to say, the castration 
is to be carried out in the day dream on the very person who 
originally threatened it. You will agree that with such a be- 
ginning one can anticipate much of the later progress of the 
analysis. 

A further technical auxiliary, which besides the use of 
dreams and daydreams comes very much to the fore in many 
of my analyses of children, isdrawingjjin three of my cases this 
for a time almost took the "pTace*^^!! other communications. 
Thus the little fire-dreamer, at the time when she was occupied 
with her castration complex, incessantly drew pictures of a fear- 
ful-looking monster in human shape, with protruding chin, 
long nose, an infinity of hair, and a frightful set of teeth. The 
name of this constantly recurring monster was "Bitey," and his 
function was clearly to bite off the male genital which he 
himself had developed in such manifold fashion on his own body. 
Another series of drawings which she made in great quantity 
during her visits, either as an accompaniment to her stories or 
in silence, portrayed all sorts of beings, children, birds, snakes 
and dolls, all with enormously extended arms and legs or beaks 
and tails. On another page in the same period she assembled all 
,of a sudden all the things she wanted to be: a boy (so as to 
possess a male member), a doll (so as to be the best-beloved), a 
dog (which to her represented virility), and a sailor boy, whom 
she took from a fantasy in which she as a boy accompanied her 
father on a voyage round the world. Above all these figures was 
yet another drawing from a half-heard and half-invented fairy 
story a witch pulling out a giant's hair; thus again a repre- 
sentation of castration for which at this time she blamed her 
mother. In strange contrast to this was a series of pictures from 
a much later period, in which a queen presented to a little 
princess standing before her a marvellous long-stemmed flower 
(obviously another penis-symbol). 

The little compulsion-neurotic drew pictures of another 
kind. She occasionally accompanied her anal fantasies, which 
took up the first part of her analysis, with illustrations. For 
example, she portrayed an anal land of Cockayne, in which in- 



24 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

stead of the mounds of porridge and tarts of the fairy story the 
people had to eat their way through a monstrous accumulation 
of pats of excrement arranged in rows. Besides that however I 
possess a series of most delicately coloured pictures of flowers 
and gardens, which she painstakingly executed with much 
neatness and grace while retailing to me her very " dirty " anal 
daydreams. 

But I fear that I have sketched for you, thus far, too ideal a 
picture of the conditions obtaining 4 in the analysis of children. 
The family readily furnishes all requisite information; the child 
is disclosed as an eager dream-interpreter bringing a rich out- 
pouring of daydreams and furnishing a series of interesting 
drawings, from all of which conclusions as to its unconscious 
impulses may be drawn. If all this is so, it is puzzling to see why 
the analysis of children has always been felt to be so difficult, or 
why so many analysts declare that they can make no headway in 
the treatment of children. 

The solution is not far to seek. The child cancels all the fore- 
going advantages by reason of the fact that it refuses to associate. 
The analyst is thus plunged into perplexity, for the very method 
on which the analytical technique is founded becomes to all 
intents and purposes useless. It is obviously contrary to.a child's 
nature to assume the easy recumbent position prescribed for the 
adult, to expunge by an effort of its own will all criticism of 
emerging ideas, to exclude nothing from its communications, 
and so to explore the surface of its consciousness. 

It is indeed true that when one has attached a child to oneself 
in the ways I have described, and made oriself indispensable to 
it, one can make it do anything. Thus for once in a way it will 
occasionally associate on being invited to do so, for a short time 
and to please the analyst. Such an interpolation of associations 
may certainly be of the greatest use and bring sudden enlighten- 
ment in a difficult situation. But it will always be of the nature 
of temporary assistance and not the secure basis on which the 
whole analytical work can be founded. 

I could sometimes ask one little girl, who in analysis proved 
particularly docile and amenable to my wishes and who with 
her great talent for drawing was especially visually perceptive, 
to "see pictures," She would then sit herself down in a remark- 



THE METHODS OF CHILDREN'S ANALYSIS 25 

uble- crouching attitude and follow attentively her inward 
images. In this way she once actually gave me the solution to a 
long drawn-out resistance situation. The preoccupation of that 
period was the struggle over masturbation and the detachment 
from her nurse, to whom she had retreated with redoubled 
affection so as to defend herself against my efforts at liberation. 
I asked her to see pictures and the first answer was "Nurse is 
flying away over the sea." This, with the addition of a vision of 
myself surrounded by a lot of dancing devils, meant that I would 
be sending the nurse away; and then she would have no defence 
against her masturbatory impulses and would be made "wicked" 
by me, 

Here and there, and more frequently than these deliberate 
and invited associations, others, unintentional and uninvited, 
come to our help. I take the little compulsion-neurotic again as 
an example. At the climax of her analysis it was a matter of 
elucidating for her her hatred of her mother, against the know- 
ledge of which she had previously defended herself by the 
creation of her "devil" as the impersonal deputy fof all her hate- 
impulses. Although up to now she had co-operated readily, she 
began at this stage to shrink from further progress. At the same 
time however she relapsed at home into all manner of insolent 
naughtiness, from which .1 daily proved to her that one could 
only hate anyone to whom one behaved so badly. Finally she 
surrendered outwardly before these constantly recurring proofs, 
but demanded to know from me also the reason for such a 
hostile feeling towards her apparently well-loved mother. Here 
I declined to give further information, for I too was at the end 
of my knowledge. Thereupon after a moment's silence she said, 
"You know, I believe it is the fault of a dream I once had" 
(some weeks before) "that we never understood." I asked her 
to repeat it, which she did: "All my dolls were there and my rabbit 
as well. Then I went away and the rabbit began to cry most dread- 
fully; and I was so sorry for it. I believe I am always copying the 
rabbit now, and that is why I keep crying like it did." In reality 
of course it was the other way round the rabbit copied her, 
not she the rabbit. In that dream she herself had taken the 
mother's place, and treated the rabbit as she had been treated 
by her. With this dream idea she had finally found the reproach 



26 ' TH PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT Otf CHILDREN 

which her consciousness always shrank from making towards 
her mother: that she had always gone away just when the child 
tnost needed hen 

Some days 1 later-she repeated the process a second time. I 
pressed her, when her whole outlook had clouded over again 
after a temporary clearing, to contribute more on the same sub- 
ject. She could not do so, but said suddenly in deep thought 
" It is so lovely at G. , I should like so much to go there again. " 
On closer question it became apparent that in a holiday in that 
place she must have passed one of her unhappiest times. Her 
elder brother had been sent back to his parents in the town 
because he had whooping cough, and she was isolated with the 
nurse and two younger children. She added spontaneously, 
"The nurse was always cross when I took the toys away from 
the little ones." Thus at that time the actual preference of the 
nurse for the younger children was added to the supposed pre- 
ference of the parents for the brother. She felt herself neglected 
on all sides and reacted in her own way. And now she had again 
found one ofher deepest reproaches against her mother through 
a recollection, this time of the beauty of the countryside in that 
place. 

I would not emphasise these three cases of surprising associa- 
tions if such things occurred more frequently in the analysis of 
children. In analysing adults they are, of course, the rule. 

This absence of the will to associate in children has led every- 
one who up to now has been concerned with the problem of 
children's analysis to seek for some substitute or other. Dr. 
Hug-Hellmuth attempted to replace the knowledge obtained 
from an adult patient's free associations by playing with the 
child, seeing it in its own circle, and trying to become familiar 
with all its intimate daily circumstances. Mrs. Melanie Klein 
substitutes for the adult association technique thejjjsrjjtech- 
aicjue with children described in her publications/ohestarfs 
from the premise that action is more natural for a little child 
than speech, and puts at its disposal a host of tiny playthings, 
a world in miniature, so that it can act in the playworld. She puts 
all the actions which the child carries out in this way on a par with 
the adult's spoken ideas, and attends them with interpretations 
as we are used to do with adult patients. It looks at first sight as 



THE METHODS OF CHILDREN S ANALYSIS 2*J 

though a distressing gap in the technique of children's analysis 
had been filled up in an unobjectionable way. I wish to reserve 
however for my next lecture an examination of the theoretical 
foundation of this play-technique, and to set it in relation to the 
last aspect of our present subject, the role of transference in 
children's analysis. 



THIRD LECTURE 
The Role of Transference in the Analysis of Children 

Ladies and Gentlemen . I will go briefly over the ground covered 
at our last meeting. 

We directed attention to the methods of the analysis of 
children; we remarked that we have to put the case-history' 
together from information furnished by the family, instead of 
relying exclusively upon that given by the patient; we became 
familiar with the child as a good dream-interpreter, and evaluated 
the significance of day dreams and imaginative drawings as 
technical auxiliaries. On the other hand I had to report that 
children are not inclined to enter into free association, and by 
this refusal oblige us to look for some substitute for this most 
essential of aids in the analysis of adults. We concluded with a 
description of 'one of these substitute methods, postponing its 
theoretical evaluation until to-day.- 

worked out by Mrs. Melanie Klein is 
ing the child. Instead of taking the 



time and trouble to pursue it into its domestic environment we 
establish at one stroke the whole of its known world in the 
analyst's room, and let it move about ih it under the analyst's eye 
but at first without his interference. In this way we have the 
opportunity of getting to know the child's various reactions, 
the strength of its aggressive impulses or of its sympathies, as 
well as its attitude to the various things and persons represented 
by the toys. There is this advantage over the observation of real 
conditions, that the toy environment is manageable and amen- 
able to the child's will, so that it can carry out in it all the actions 
which in the real world, so much bigger and stronger than itself, 
remain confined to a phantasy-existence. All these merits make 
the use of the Klein play-method almost indispensable for fami- 
liarisation with small children, who are not yet capable of verbal 
self-expression, 



THE ROLE OF TRANSFERENCE 29 

Mrs. Klein however takes an Important further step in the 
employment of this technique. She assumes the same status for 
these play-actions of the child as for the free associations of the 
adult patient, and translates as she goes along the actions under- 
taken by the child in this way into corresponding thoughts ; that 
is to say, she tries to find beneath everything done in play its 
underlying symbolic function. If the child overturns a lamp- 
post or a toy figure she interprets it as something of an aggressive 
impulse against the father; a deliberate collision between two 
cars as evidence of an observation of sexual union between the 
parents. Her procedure consists in accompanying the child's 
activities with translations and interpretations, which themselves 
like the interpretation of the adult's free associations exert a 
further influence upon the patient. 




"free," that is to say the patient has divested his thoughts of all 
direction and influence, but his attitude is nevertheless in- 
fluenced by a certain consideration that -he who is associating 
has set himself to be analvsed. The child lacks this attitude. I 

Jt*^,rfS^ '"'-**,, ..**., , ... 

think it is possible, as I have explained before, to give the children 
some idea of the purpose of analysis. But the children for whom 
Mrs. Klein has worked out her play-technique, in the first 
infantile period, are too young to be influenced in this way. 
Mrs. Klein considers it as one of the important advantages of 
her method that by it she is saved the necessity of such a pre- 
paration of the child. JButjthe child's pl^yi&jaotvdoJTUtiated by 
the s^m,e p.wrppsiye attitiidels"$,e "adult's free association, there 
is no justification, for trQati^Lgitaa.Jip^ipg^he ; sa^e sjigiiificance. 
Instead of being invested with symbolic meaning it may some- 
times admit of a harmless explanation. The child who upsets a 
toy lamp-post may on its walk the day before have come across 
some incident in connection with such an object; the car collision 
may be reproducing some happening in the street ; and the child 
who runs towards a lady visitor and opens her handbag is not 
necessarily, as Mrs. Klein maintains, thereby symbolically ex- 
pressing its curiosity as to whether its mother's womb conceals 
another little brother or sister, but may be connecting some 
experience of the previous day when someone brought it a little 



3O THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

present in a similar receptacle. Indeed with an adult we do not 
consider ourselves justified in ascribing a symbolic significance 
to every one of his acts or ideas, but only to those which arise 
under the influence of the analytical situation which he has 
accepted. 

In reply to this objection to the Klein technique it may be 
said that a child's play is certainly open to the harmless inter- 
pretation just suggested, but why does it reproduce just those 
particular scenes with the lamp-post or the cars? Is it not just 
the symbolic significance behind these observations which 
cause them to be preferred and reproduced before any others in 
the analytical hour? It is true, the argument may proceed, that 
the child lacks in its actions the purposive attitude of the analyti- 
cal situation, which guides the adult. But perhaps it does not 
need it at all. The adult must renounce the guidance of his 
thoughts by a conscious effort of will and leave their direction 
entirely to his unconscious impulses. But the child may require 
no such deliberate modification of its situation. Perhaps it is at 
all times and in every piece of play entirely surrendered to the 
domination of its unconscious. 

It is not easy to determine by an exchange of theoretical 
arguments the question of whether the equation of children's 
play with adults' free association is justifiable or not. This is 
obviously a matter for review in the light of practical experience. 

Let us try criticism on another point. We know that Mrs. 
Klein utilises for interpretation, besides the things which the 
child does with the toys provided, all its procedure towards the 
objects found in her room or towards her own person. Here 
again she follows strictly the example of adult analysis, We 
certainly feel justified in drawing into the analysis all the patient's 
behaviour towards us during the visit, and all the little voluntary 
and involuntary actions which we observe him to perform. In 
this we are relying upon the state of transference in which he 
finds himself, which can invest even otherwise trivial behaviour 
with symbolical significance. 

Here the question arises as to whether a child finds itself in 
the same transference situation as the adult; in what manner 
and in what forms its transference-impulses come to expression ; 
and in what they lend themselves to interpretation. We have 



THE ROLE OF TRANSFERENCE 3 I 

come to the important consideration, of the role of trans/ erence as 
a technical expedient in the analysis oj children. The decision on this 
question will at the same time furnish fresh material to con- 
trovert or support Mrs. Klein's contention. 

I explained in the first lecture how I took great pains to 
establish in the child a strong attachment to myself, and to bring 
it into a relationship of real dependence on me. I would not 
have tried so hard to do this, if I had thought the analysis of 
children could be carried out without a transference of this kind. 
But the affectionate attachment, the positive transference as it is 
called in analytical terminology, is the prerequisite for all later 
work. The child in fact will only believe the loved person, and 
it will only accomplish something to please that person. 

The analysis of children requires much more from this 
attachment than in the case of adults. There is an educational 
as well as an analytical purpose with which we shall later be 
concerned in more detail: ,i3^^ n Qt 

only in children's ana iy S jg_;^ pomTs* 

attachme^ 

pgggj^^ ^ a t th e establishment of a 

transference is in itself enough for our purpose, regardless of 
whether it is friendly or hostile. We know that with an adult we 
can get through long periods with a negative transference, 
which we turn to our account through consistent interpretation 
and reference to its origins. But with a^cWJji negative impulses 
towards the analyst however revealingpey may be in many 
respects are essentially inconvenient,\J|tid should be dealt 
with as soon as possible. Thgj^^ 

I have described the establishment of this affectionate tie 
during our discussion of the introductory phase to the analysis 
of children. Its expression in fantasies and small or larger 
actions is hardly distinguishable from the equivalent processes 
in adult patients. We are made to feel the negative reactions at 
every point where we attempt to assist a fragment of repressed 
material towards liberation from the unconscious, thereby 
drawing upon ourselves the resistance of the ego. At such a 
time we appear to the child as the dangerous and to-be-feared 
tempter ? and we bring on ourselves all the expressions of hatred 



32, THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

and repulsion with which at other times it treats its own for- 
bidden instinctual impulses. 

I will give an account of a positive transference-fantasy from 
the six-year-old obsessional patient. The external occasion for 
it -was furnished by myself., for I had visited her in her own home 
and stayed for her evening bath. She opened her visit on the 
nextday with the words/ *you visited mein my bath and next time 
111 come and visit you in yours." Some while later she retailed 
for me the daydream which she had composed in bed before 
going to sleep, after I had gone away. I add her own explanatory 
asides in brackets. 

"All the rich people did not like you. And your father who 
was very rich did not like you at all. (That means I am angry 
with your father., don't you think?) And you liked no one and 
gave lessons to no one. And my father and mother hated me 
and so did John and Billy and Mary and all the people in the 
world hated us, even the people we did not know, even the dead 
people. So you liked only me and I liked only you and we 
always stayed together. All the others were very rich but we 
two were quite poor. We had nothing, not even clothes for they 
took away everything we had. There was only the sofa left in 
the room and we slept on that together. But we were quite 
happy together. And then we thought we ought to have a baby. 
So we mixed 'a-a and cissies to make a baby. But then we 
thought that was not a nice thing to make a baby out of. So we 
began to mix flower-petals and things that gave me a baby. For 
the baby was in me. It stayed in me quite a long while (my 
mother told me that, that babies stay quite a long while in their 
mothers) and then the doctor took it out. But I was not a bit 
sick (mothers usually are, my mother said). The baby was very 
sweet and cunning and so we thought we'd like to be just as 
cunning and changed ourselves to be very small. I was "so" 
high and you were "so" high. (That is, I think because in our 
lesson last week we found out that I wanted to be like Billy and 
Mary.) And as we had nothing at all we started to make our- 
selves a house out of rose-leaves, and beds out of rose-leaves and 
pillows and mattresses all out of rose-leaves sewn together. 
Where the little holes were left we put something white in. In- 
stead of wall-paper we had the thinnest glass and the walls were 



THE ROLE OF TRANSFERENCE 33 

carved in different patterns. The chairs were made of glass too 
but we were so light, that we were not too heavy for them. (I 
think I left my mother out because I was angry with her for not 
coming to see me.)" Then there followed a detailed description 
of the furniture and all the things that were made for the house. 
The daydream was obviously spun out in this direction until she 
went to sleep, laying special emphasis on the point that our 
initial poverty was finally quite made up for and that in the end 
we had much nicer things than all the first mentioned rich 
people* 

The same little patient at other times related how she was 
warned against me from within. The inner voice said, '"Don't 
believe Anna Freud. She tells lies. She will not help you and 
will only make you worse. She will change your face too, so 
that you look uglier. Everything she says is not true. Just be 
tired, stay quietly in bed and don't go to her to-day." But she 
always told this voice to be silent and said to it that it should be 
told of first of all in the next appointment. 

Another small patient envisaged me, at the time when we 
were discussing her masturbation, in all sorts of degrading 
rdles as a beggar, as a poor old woman, and once as just myself 
but standing in the middle of my room with devils dancing 
round me. 

You will notice that we become the object towards which the 
patient's friendly or hostile impulses are directed, just as we do 
in the case of adults. It might seem from these examples that a 
child makes a good transference. Unfortunately that is not 
really true. The child indeed enters into the liveliest relations 
with the analyst, and evinces a multitude of reactions which it 
has acquired in the relationship with its parents ; it give? us most 
important hints on the formation of its character in the fluctua- 
tion, intensity, and expression of its feelings; but it forms no 
transference neurosis. 

The analysts amongst you will know what I mean by this. 
The adult neurotic gradually transforms, in the course of analy- 
tic treatment, the symptom on account of which he sought this 
remedy. He gives up the old objects on which his fantasies were 
hitherto fixed, and centres his neurosis anew upon the person of 
the analyst. As we put it, he substitutes transference-symptoms 



34 TOE [PSYCHOANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

^^^D^Wm : ^yptam\ tran ^ oses his existing neurosis, of 
whatever kind, into a transference-neurosis, and displays all his 
abnormal reactions in relation to the new transference person, 
the analyst. On this new ground, where the analyst feels at 
home, he can follow up with the patient the origin and growth 
of the individual symptoms; and on this cleared field of opera- 
tions there then takes place the final struggle, for gradual in- 
sight into the malady and the discovery to the patient of the 
unconscious processes within him, 

There are two possible reasons why this cannot be brought 
about In the case of a small child. One lies within the psycho- 
logical structure of the child itself, the other in the child's 
analyst. 

The child is not, like the adult, ready to produce a new 
edition of its love-relationships, because, as one might say, the 
old edition is not yet exhausted. Its original objects, the parents, 
are still real and present as love-objects not only in fantasy as 
with the adult neurotic; between them and the child exist all the 
relations of everyday life, and all its gratifications and dis- 
appointments still in reality depend on them. The analyst enters 
this situation as a new person, and will probably share with the 
parents the child's love or hate. But there is no necessity for the 
child to exchange the parents for him, since compared to them 
he has not the advantages which the adult finds when he can 
exchange his fantasy-objects for a real person. Let us in this 
connection reconsider Mrs. Klein's method. She maintains 
that when a child evinces hostility towards her in the first visit, 
repulsing or even beginning to strike her, one may see in that 
a proof of the child's ambivalent attitude towards its mother* 
The hostile components of this ambivalence are merely dis- 
placed onto the analyst. But I believe the truth of the matter is 
different. The more tenderly a little child is attached to its own 
mother, the fewer friendly impulses it has towards strangers. 
We see this most clearly with the baby, who shows only anxious 
rejection towards everyone other than its mother or nurse. In- 
deed the converse obtains. It is especially with children who are 
accustomed to little loving treatment at home, and are not used 
to showing or receiving any strong affection, that a positive 
relationship is often most quickly established. They obtain 



THE ROLE OF TRANSFERENCE 3 

from the analyst what they have up till now expected in vain 
from the original love objects. 

On the other hand, the behaviour of the children's analyst, 
as we have described him, is not such as to produce a transfer- 
ence that can be well interpreted. We know how we bear our- 
selves in the analysis of adults for this purpose. We remain 
impersonal and shadowy, a blank page on which the patient 
can inscribe his transference-fantasies, somewhat after the 
way in which at the cinema a picture is thrown upon an empty 
screen. We avoid either issuing prohibitions, or allowing 
gratifications. If in spite of this we seem to the patient for- 
bidding or encouraging, it is easy to make it clear to him that 
he has brought the material for this impression from his own 
past. 

But the children's analyst must be, anything but a shadow. 
We have already remarked that he is a person of interest to 
the child, endowed with all sorts of interesting and attractive 
qualities. The educational implications which, as you will 
hear, are involved in the analysis, result in the child knowing 
very well just what seems to the analyst desirable or undesir- 
able, and what he sanctions or disapproves of. And such a well- 
defined and in many respects novel personality is unfortunately 
a bad transference-object, of little use when it comes to inter- 
preting the transference. The difficulty here is, as though, to 
use our former illustration, the screen on which a film was to 
be projected already bore another picture. The more elaborate 
and brightly-coloured it is, the more will it tend to efface the 
outlines of what is superimposed. 

no 



In spite of all its positive and 
analyst it continues to display its abnormal reactions where 
they were displayed before in the home circle. Because of 
this the children's analyst is obliged to take into account not 
only what happens under his own eye but also what occurs in 
the real scene of the neurotic reactions, i.e. the child's home. 
Here we come to an infinity of practical technical difficulties 
in the analysis of children, which I only lay broadly before you 
without going into actual detail. Working from this standpoint 
we are dependent upon a permanent news-service about the 



36 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

child; we must know the people in its environment and be 
sure to some extent of what their reactions to the child are. 
In the ideal case, we share our work with the persons who are 
actually bringing up the child; just as we share with them the 
child's affection or hostility. 

Where the external conditions, or the personalities of the 
parents, do not allow of such co-operative treatment, certain 
material for the analysis eludes us. On this account I had to 
conduct some analyses of children almost exclusively by means 
of dreams and daydreams. There was nothing interpretable 
in the transference and much of the day-to-day symptomatic 
neurotic material, never became available to me. 

But there are ways and means to bring about an equation 
of the child's situation to that of the adult (so; much better 
suited for the carrying through of analysis); and so to force the 
child into a transference neurosis. This may become necessary 
where it is a case of severe neurotic illness in an environment 
hostile either to analysis or the child. In such a case the 
child would have to be removed from its family and 
placed in some suitable institution. As there is no such 
institution in existence at present we are at full liberty to imagizie 
one, say a home supervised by the children's analyst himself, 
or- less far-fetched a school where psychoanalytical prin- 
ciples predominate and the work is attuned to co-operation 
with the analyst. In both cases a symptom-free period would 
first occur, in which the child accustoms itself to the new and 
favourable surroundings. The better it feels at this time, the 
more unapt and unwilling for analysis shall we find it. We 
shall probably do best to leave it quite undisturbed. Only 
when it has "acclimatised itself ?> , that is to say when under 
the influence of the realities of everyday life it has formed an 
attachment to the new environment, beside which the original 
objects gradually pale; when it allows its symptoms to revive 
again in this new existence, and groups its abnormal reactions 
around new personages; when it has thus formed its transfer- 
ence-neurosis will it become analysable once more. 

In an institution of the first sort, managed by the children's 
analyst (and at present we cannot even judge whether such an 
arrangement is to be desired) it would then be ( q. matter of an 



THE ROLE OF TRANSFERENCE 37 

actual transference-neurosis in the sense of the adult's, with 
the analyst as focal object. In the other sort we should simply 
have artificially bettered the home environment, creating a 
substitute home which so to say allows us to see into it, as seems 
necessary for the analytical work, and the reactions of which 
towards the child we can control and regulate. 

Thus the removal of the child from its home might appear 
to be the most practical solution. But when we come to consider 
the termination of a child's analysis, we shall see how many 
objections there are to it. By this expedient we forestall the 
natural development at a crucial stage, forcing the child's 
premature detachment from the parental objects at a time 
when it neither is capable of any independence in its emotional 
life, nor has at its disposal, owing to external circumstances, 
any freedom in the choice of new love- objects. Even if we 
insist on a very long duration for the analysis of children there 
still remains in most cases a hiatus between its termination and 
the development of puberty, during which the child needs 
education, protection, and guidance in every sense of the 
words. But what gives us any assurance that after we have 
secured a successful resolution of the transference the child 
will find of itself the way to the right objects? It returns home 
at a time when it has become a stranger there, and its further 
guidance is now perhaps entrusted to the very persons from 
whom we have forcibly detached it. On inner grounds it is 
not capable of self-reliance. We are thus placing it in a position 
of renewed difficulty, in which it will find again most of the 
original elements of its conflict. It can now take either once 
more the path to neurosis or, if this is closed to it by the successful 
outcome of the analytical treatment, the opposite line of open 
rebellion. From the purely therapeutical point of view this 
may seem an advantage; but from that of social adjustment 
which in the child's case matters most in the end, it is certainly 
none. 



FOURTH LECTURE 

The Analysis of Children and I heir Upbringing 

Ladies and Gentlemen. We have, so far, considered two 
aspects of the analysis of children and to-day I will turn to the 
third and perhaps most important. 

Let me once more retrace our progress. The first part was 
concerned, as you may remember, with the introductory phase 
in the analysis of children. This has no bearing on analytical 
theory. I did not describe all those paltry and childish methods 
and occupations, crochetting, knitting, and games, all the 
various means of enticement, because I consider them im- 
portant for analysis, but on the contrary rather to show what an 
intractable subject the child is, and how it is not amenable to 
the best-tried methods of scientific therapy but absolutely 
requires that its own childish peculiarities should be appro- 
priately matched. Whatever we embark on with a child, 
whether to teach it arithmetic or geography, whether intending 
to educate or analyse, we must always first establish a very de- 
finite emotional relationship with it. The harder the work to be 
done, the higher must be the strain-capacity of this attachment. 
The introduction to the treatment, that is to say the establish- 
ment of this tie, thus follows its own rules, determined by child- 
ish nature and temporarily independent of analytical theory and 
technique. 

The second part of my exposition dealt with analysis proper, 
and surveyed the paths whereby one can approach a child's 
unconscious. It is disappointing that the very best and most 
specific expedients in the analysis of adults are not available for 
that of children, and that we must fall short of many of the 
obligations imposed by scientific theory and obtain our material 
where we can find it much as we do in the ordinary way if we 
wish to enter into someone's private life. I suspect there is a 
further disappointment. Since I have been doing analysis of 



ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN AND THEIR UPBRINGING 39 

children I have often been asked by analytical colleagues, 
whether I have not gained some closer understanding than can 
be had from the analysis of adults of the developmental pro- 
cesses of the first two years of life, towards which our analytical 
investigations are ever more urgently directed. The child, they 
say, is still so much nearer to this significant period, its repres- 
sions must be still so much less deeply embedded, the overlaid 
material so much easier of access, that there should surely be 
special facilities for investigation. 

So far I have always had to answer these questions with a 
negative. The material which the child affords us is indeed, as 
you may have noticed from my illustrations, especially clear 
and unequivocal. It supplies all sorts of evidence as to the con- 
tents of children's neuroses, the presentation of which I shall 
reserve for another occasion. It brings much welcome con- 
firmation of facts which up to now we have only been able to 
assert on conclusions drawn from the analysis of adults. But so 
far as my experience goes, with the technique I have described, 
it does not take us beyond the boundaries where the child's 
speech-faculty begins and so where it thinks in the same way 
as we do. The theoretical explanation of this is easy to find. 
What we learn in the analysis of adults about this "prehistork^ 

^ , ayiffg/i^&ff^^^^*^^^^ 

period is brought to light through free associations and the 
interpretation of the transference-reactions; the very two 
auxiliaries which leave us in the lurch in the analysis of children. 
Besides, our situation may be compared to that of an ethnolo- 
gist, who would also seek in vain for a short cut to prehistory in 
studying a primitive people instead of a cultured race. He 
would miss in the primitive people all the help from the creation 
of myth and saga which enables him to draw conclusions in the 
case of the cultured people. Similarly with the small child we 
lack the reaction-formations and cover-memories which are 
only constructed in the course of the latency period, and from 
which the later analysis can extract the material condensed in 
them. Here again, therefore, the analysis of children offers no 
advantage over that of adults but is in fact less able to extract 
unconscious material. 

And now for the third aspect, the utilisation of the analytical 
material which with such painful preparation and by so many 



40 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

paths and bypaths we have brought to light. You will be 
prepared by now to hear a good deal that is unexpected and 
deviates from the classical rules. 

Let us first reconsider in rather more detail the corres- 
ponding situation in the adult patient. His neurosis is, as we 
know, entirely an int^ml affair. It is played out between three 
factors, hisjflsl^ his Ego, and hjis 4 .^]upjgr- 

ego, whidHast represents* te ethical' and aesthetic demands of 
society. The task of analysis is to raise the conflict between 
these protagonists to a higher level, by making conscious what 
is unconscious. The instinctual impulses were up till now 
removed from the influence of the Super-ego by the condition 
of repression. Analysis frees them and makes them accessible 
to the influence of the Super-ego by which their further, fate 
will then be determined. Conscious criticism, the rejection of 
part, takes the place of repression, while of the remainder part 
can be sublimated away from its sexual aims and part may be 
allowed gratification. This favourable outcome is to be ascribed 
to the fact that^ the patient's Ego, between the time when it 
instituted its original repressions and the point when analysis 
achieves its task of liberation,- has undergone its whole ethical 
and intellectual "development, and so is in a position to make 
other decisions than those which were originally open to it. 
The instinctual life must submit to various restrictions, and 
the Super-ego must surrender many of its exaggerated preten- 
sions* On the common ground of activity in consciousness a 
synthesis between the two is brought about. 

And now compare with this the conditions of the child 
patient's case. The child's neurosis is also certainly an internal 
affair, determined by the same three forces, the instinctual life, 
the Ego and the Super-ego. But we are already prepared to 
find that at two points in the child's case the outer world pene- 
trates deeply into its inner situation as a factor indeed incon- 
venient for the analysis but organically important. In dis- 
cussing the introductory phase required for the analysis of 
children we were obliged to ascribe so important a factor as 
insight into the malady, not to the child itself, but to the people 
surrounding it; and in describing the transference-situation 
we demonstrated that the analyst is obliged to share the child's 



ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN AND THEIR UPBRINGING 4! 

available hostile and loving impulses with the original objects 
of these feelings. We are thus not surprised that the outer 
world affects the mechanism of infantile neurosis and analysis 
more deeply than in the adult case. 

We have said that the Super-ego of an adult individual has 
become the representative of moral demands made by the 
society in which he lives. We know that it owes its origin to 
the identification with the first and most important of the 
child's love objects, the parents; to them society had trans- 
ferred the task of establishing its current ethical claims on the 
child and enforcing the restrictions upon instinct which it 
prescribes. Thus what was originally a personal obligation 
felt towards the parents, only turns into an ego-ideal, inde- 
pendent of its prototypes, in the course of development from 
object-love for the parents to identification with them. 

In the child's case however there is as yet no question of 
such independence. Detachment from the first loved objects 
lies still in the future, and identification, while the original 
object-love is maintained, will only be accomplished gradually 
and piecemeal. A Super-ego indeed exists, and many of the 
interactions between it and the Ego seem even at this early 
period analogous to those of the later and mature develop- 
ment. But the "constant relation" between this Super-ego 
and the objects to which it owes its establishment must not be 
overlooked; we might compare it to that between two recep- 
tacles connected together. If in the outer world the level of 
good relations with the parents rises, so does the prestige of 
the Super-ego and the energy with which it enforces its claims. 
If the former is lowered, the Super-ego is diminished as well. 

Let us take the infant as the first example. When the mother 
or nurse has succeeded in accustoming the little child to the 
control of its excretory functions, we soon get the impression 
that it fulfils these requirements of cleanliness not only for the 
sake of the adult (for love or fear of her), but that it has itself 
some interest in the matter, is pleased with its own cleanliness 
or vexed if it has an "accident". We notice over and over again, 
however, that a subsequent separation from the person who 
has inculcated this cleanliness, such as a temporary removal 
from the mother or a change of nurse, puts the new achievement 



42 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

into jeopardy. The child will become just as dirty as it was 
before it learnt the new ways and will only re-acquire them 
when the mother returns or an attachment is formed to the new 
nurse. Nevertheless the impression that the child had itself 
felt an obligation to cleanliness was not altogether deceptive. 
The inner prompting exists, but is only worth while to the 
child while the, person responsible for its establishment retains 
her place as loved object in the outer world. Where the object- 
relationship lapses, so does the satisfaction in fulfilling the 
obligation. 

But even at the opening of the latency-period the same 
factors apply. From the analysis of adults we can find ample 
confirmation of how much any dislocation of a child's ties 
with its parents may disturb its moral development and forma- 
tion of character. If at this time it loses its parents through 
separation of any kind, or if as objects they are depreciated in 
its eyes, perhaps through some such cause as a mental illness 
or criminality, its already extensively-constructed Super-ego 
is in danger of being lost or depreciated too; so that it can re- 
oppose no real inner volition to the instinctual impulses which 
press for satisfaction. The origin of many anti-social and 
character abnormalities may be explained in this way. 

To illustrate these conditions, even at the end of the latency- 
period, I will add an example from the analysis of a pre-adoles- 
cent boy. I once asked him, whether he was ever aware of any 
thoughts which one would prefer not to have. He answered 
"Yes, when one wants to steal something". I asked him to 
describe such an occasion, and he said "For example when I 
am alone at home and there is some fruit, and my father and 
mother have gone out without giving me any. Then I get to 
thinking how I should like to take some. But then I think 
about something else because I don't mean to steal." I asked 
if he was always stronger than these thoughts. He said yes, 
he had never stolen anything. "What do you do," I said, "when 
they are very strong?" "I still don't take anything," he said 
triumphantly, "for then I am Afraid of my father." 

You observe that his Super-ego has reached a considerable 
degree of independence, which was expressed in his own wish 
not to be a thief. But when the temptation was too strong he 



ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN AND THEIR UPBRINGING 43 

must bring in the support of the person to whom this wish 
owed its existence, namely the father with the warnings and 
threats of punishment associated with him. Another child in 
his place would perhaps have called to mind his love for his 
mother. 

From this weakness and dependence of the claims of the 
child's Ego-ideal follows another observation, which can be 
confirmed any number of times : the child has a double set 
of morals, one for the grown-up world and one for itself and 
its contemporaries. We know for example that at a certain 
age a child begins to feel shame, that is to say it avoids showing 
itself naked, or performing its excretory functions before 
strange grown-ups and later even before those best known to 
it. But we know too that the same child will undress without 
any shame before other children, and they will often want to 
go to the lavatory together. Again., we can establish the surpris- 
ing fact that a child will only be disgusted at certain things in 
the presence of grown-ups, and thus as it were under pressure 
from them, while when it is alone or with other children no 
such reaction appears. I remember a ten-year-old boy who on a 
walk suddenly pointed to a cow-pat and exclaimed with interest 
"Look, how funny that is!" The next moment he realised his 
mistake and blushed. Later he excused himself to me, saying 
he had not at first seen what it was or he would never have men- 
tioned it. But I know from the same boy that when he is with 
his friends he talks about the excretory functions with amuse- 
ment and no embarrassment. He also once assured me that 
when he is alone he can touch his own excrement with his 
hand without any particular feeling, but when any grown-up 
is there he finds it very difficult even to mention it. 

Shame and disgust are important reaction-formations 
designed to restrain the child's anal and exhibitionistic impulses 
from breaking through to gratification; but even when they 
are fully established, they depend upon the relationship with 
the adult object for their maintenance and efficacy. 

With these observations as to the dependent stage of the 
childish Super-ego, and the child's double morals in relation 
to shame and disgust, we have arrived at the most important 
difference between the analysis of children and of adults. The 



44 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

former is by no means an entirely private affair, played out 
exclusively between two persons, the analyst and his patient. 
Insofar as the childish Super-ego has not yet become the 
impersonal representative of the obligations undertaken at the 
behest of the outer world, insofar as it is still organically con- 
nected with it, the relevant outer world objects play an im- 
portant role in the analysis itself, and especially in its last part, 
the utilisation of the instinctual impulses which have been 
freed from repression* 

Let us resume once more the comparison with the adult 
neurotic. We said that in his analysis we only had to reckon 
with his instinctual life, his Ego and his Super-ego; we need 
not trouble ourselves with the fate of the impulses which have 
emerged from the unconscious. These come under the influ- 
ence of his Super-ego, which bears the responsibility for their 
further employment. 

Where is this responsibility to lie in the case of a child's 
analysis? Is it to rest with those concerned with the child's 
upbringing, with whom its Super-ego is still inseparably 
bound up, that is, with its parents? 

But awkward considerations are involved here. It was these 
same parents or guardians whose exorbitant requirements 
drove the child into an excess of repression and into neurosis. 
They, with their unchanged outlook are the very people who 
are now called upon to help in its recovery. Only in the most 
favourable cases have they learnt enough from the child's 
illness to be ready to mitigate their demands. Thus it seems 
dangerous to turn responsibility for the newly-liberated 
instinctual life over to them. There is too great risk that the 
child will be forced once more into the path to repression and 
neurosis. In such circumstances it would have been more 
economical to have omitted altogether the wearisome and 
painful process of liberation by analysis. 

Again, in the child's case there is no such long interval 
between the formation of the neurosis and its resolution through 
analysis as there is in the case of the adult patient, who between 
these two stages undergoes his whole Ego-development, so 
that the being who made the original choice can hardly be 
called the same person as he who undertakes its revision. 



ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN AND THEIR UPBRINGING 45 

Would it be admissible to declare the child, just because of its 
neurosis and its analysis, prematurely of age; and expect from 
it itself the important decisions as to how it shall henceforward 
deal with the impulses now placed at its disposal? I do not 
know to what ethical basis it could have resort, to what criteria 
or practical considerations, to enable it to find a way through 
these difficulties. I think that, left alone and with every outer 
support withdrawn,, it can only find one single short and con- 
venient path that of direct gratification. We know however 
from analytical theory and practice that, in the very interest of 
preventing neurosis, it is desirable to avoid too much direct 
gratification at any stage of a child's necessarily perverse 
sexuality. Otherwise fixation on the once-experienced pleasure 
will prove to be a hindrance to further normal development, 
and the urge for its revival a dangerous incentive to regression 
from later stages. 

So it seems to me that there remains but one solution for 
this difficult situation. The analyst must claim for himself 
liberty to guide the child at this important point, so as to be 
able to make secure, to some extent, the achievement of the 
analysis. Under his influence the child must learn how to 
conduct itself in regard to its instinctual life, and his views 
must in the end determine what part of the infantile sexual 
impulses must be suppressed or rejected as unemployable in 
the cultural world; how, much or how little can be allowed 
direct gratification; and what must be guided into the path of 
sublimation, for which process all the available resources of 
education can then be used. We may say in short, that the 
analyst must succeed in putting himself in the "place of the child' V 
Ego-ideal for the duration of the analysis ; he ought not to begin 
his analytical work of liberation until he has made sure that the 
child is eager to follow his lead. The position of authority 
about which we spoke at the beginning, in connection with 
the introductory phase in the analysis of children, at this stage 
becomes essential ; before the child can give the highest place 
in its emotional life, that of the Ego-ideal, to, this new love 
object which ranks with the parents, it must feel that the 
analyst's authority is even greater than theirs. 

If the child's parents have learnt something from its illness ? 



46 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

and show an inclination to conform to the analyst's require- 
ments, a real division of analytic and educational labour between 
home and analyst becomes possible or rather a co-operation 
between the two. The child's education suffers no inter- 
ruption even at the termination of the analysis, but passes back, 
wholly and directly, from the hands of the analyst into those 
of the now more understanding parents. 

But if the parents use their influence to work against the 
analyst the result, since the child is emotionally attached to 
both, is a situation similar to that in an unhappy marriage 
where the child has become an object of contention. When 
the scene is set thus we cannot be surprised if all the injurious 
consequences for the formation of character, with which we 
are familiar in such cases, occur here as well. In the one instance 
the child plays father and mother, in the other analyst and home, 
against each other, and in both he uses the conflict as a means 
of escape from all obligations. There is peril in these conditions 
if a child in a resistance-situation is enabled so to prevail with 
the parents against the analyst that they break off the analysis. 
The child is lost to the analyst at the very worst moment, in a 
state of resistance and negative transference, and is sure to 
take advantage in the most undesirable ways of all the liber- 
ations already secured by the analysis. To-day I would not 
undertake the analysis of a child where the personalities of the 
parents, or their analytical understanding, did not provide a 
guarantee against such an outcome. 

I will give one last example to illustrate how necessary it is 
that the analyst should be in control of the relationship between 
the child's Ego and its instincts. 

When I had brought the six-years-old compulsion neurotic 
to the point of allowing her "devil" to speak, she began to 
communicate to me a large number of anal fantasies, hesitatingly 
at first but soon with ever increasing boldness and detail as she 
saw that no expressions of displeasure on my part were forth- 
coming. Gradually the analytical hour became entirely given 
up to anal confidenc.es, and was the repository of all the day- 
dreams of this kind which otherwise oppressed her. While she 
talked in this way with me the constant oppression was relieved. 
She herself called the time with me her "rest-hour", Sh<? 



ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN AND THEIR UPBRINGING 47 

once said "My time with you, Anna Freud, is my rest-hour. I 
don't have to restrain my devil. But no", she went on, "I 
have another rest, when I am asleep. " Thus during analysis 
and sleep she was clearly relieved from the equivalent of the 
adult's constant expenditure of energy in maintaining repres- 
sion. Her relief showed itself above all in an altered nature, 
lively and alert. 

After a time she went a step further. She began to show 
something of her hitherto strictly guarded fantasies and anal 
ideas at home as well, making for example, when a dish came 
onto the table, a half-audible comparison or a "smutty" joke 
to the other children. The lady who then had the care of the 
child came to me for advice as to what to do. At that time I 
was still inexperienced, and I took the situation lightly, advising 
that one should neither acquiesce in nor dissent from such 
small manifestations, but simply let them pass unnoticed. The 
effect was unexpected. The child lost all moderation, carried 
over into her home all the ideas to which she had previously 
only given expression during analysis, and completely revelled, 
as she had with me, in her anal notions, comparisons, and 
expressions. The grown-ups in the house soon found this 
intolerable, and losf all appetite especially on account of the 
child's behaviour at the common dinner table; and soon it 
happened that one after another, children as well as grown-ups, 
left the room in silent disapproval. My little patient had 
behaved like a pervert or a mentally-afflicted adult, and thereby 
put herself beyond the pale of society. Since she was not 
penalised by being removed from the company of the others, 
the consequence was that they avoided her. By now she had 
abandoned all restraints in other respects as well. In a few days 
she had become transformed into a cheerful, over-bold and 
naughty child, by no means dissatisfied with herself. 

Then came the guardian to me a second time, to complain. 
She said the state of affairs was unendurable. What ought she 
to do? Could she tell the child that talking of such things was 
not in itself wicked, but ask her to give it up at home for her 
sake? I did not agree to this suggestion. I had to realise that 
I had made a blunder, in crediting the child's Super-ego with 
an independent inhibitory strength which it did not possess. 



48 TH PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT o CHILDREN 

As soon as the important people in the outer world had relaxed 
their requirements the child's Ego-ideal, which was previously 
so strict and had been strong enough to bring forth a whole 
series of obsessional symptoms, suddenly became compliant. 
I had relied on this compulsive strictness and had been in- 
cautious; thereby I had not even forwarded the analysis, I 
had for a while made out of an inhibited, obsessional child a 
naughty, one might say perverted, one. But I had ruined 
the situation for my work. Thjp emancipated child now had 
her "rest-hour" all day long, and considerably abated her 
enthusiasm for working with me; she no longer furnished 
proper material for it, for this was spread over the whole day 
instead of being reserved for the analysis, and she had tempor- 
arily lost the insight into the malady which is so necessary. 
The maxim that gratification should be withheld, if analysis 
is to be successful has even greater application to the analysis 
of children than to that of adults. 

Fortunately the situation was not so bad as it looked and in 
practice it was easy to solve it. I bade the guardian do nothing 
further, and have a little patience. I would bring the child to 
order again, only I could not promise how soon the result 
would show. On the child's next visit I acted energetically; I 
said all this was a breach of our agreement ; I had thought she 
was going to tell me all those things, so as to be rid of them, but 
now I saw that this was by no means so. She meant to tell them 
to everybody, for the pleasure of doing so. I had nothing against 
that, but in that case I could not see that she had any further 
use for me; we could simply give up our hours together and 
leave her pleasure to her. But if she remained of her first inten- 
tion, she must tell these things only to me and to no one else. 
The more she refrained from at home, the more would occur 
to her wifh me; the more I would know about her and the more 
I would be able to rid her of. She must now choose between 
the alternatives. 

She went very pale and reflected for some time, and then 
looked at me and said, with the same thoughtful comprehension 
as on the first occasion "If you say that that is how it is I will 
not talk like that any more." With that her obsessional con- 
scientiousness returned. From that day no mention of the 



ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN AND THEIR UPBRINGING 49 

objectionable subjects crossed her lips again at home. She 
was re-transformed, but she had again become, from a naughty 
and perverted child, an inhibited and apathetic one. 

I had to accomplish a similar transformation of the same 
patient several more times in the course of her treatment. 
Always when she escaped, on analytical liberation from her 
unusually severe compulsion-neurosis, to the other extreme, 
to naughtiness and perversion, there remained nothing for it 
but for me to bring about the neurosis again and restore the 
already vanished "devil'' once more to his place; each time 
naturally in climinishing degrees and with greater precautions 
and gentleness than home education had used, until finally I 
got the child to hold a middle course between the two extremes. 

I would not have enlarged upon this example if it were 
not that it serves to illustrate all the characteristics of the 
analysis of children put forward in this last section of our dis- 
cussion: the fact that a child's Super-ego is weak; that Super- 
ego demands and neurosis are dependent on the outer world ; 
that the child is unable to control the emancipated instincts; 
and that the analyst himself must guide them. 1 The analyst 
accordingly combines in his own person two difficult and dia- 
metrically opposed functions: he has to analyse and educate, 
that is to say in the same breath he must allow and forbid, loosen 
and bind again. If he does not succeed in this, analysis becomes 
the child's charter for all the ill conduct prohibited by society. 
But if he succeeds, he undoes a piece of wrong education and 
abnormal development, and so procures for the child, or 
whoever controls its destiny, an opportunity to improve matters. 

In the case of an adult's analysis, we do not compel the 
patient to be well at the end of- it. What he shall do with the 
choice newly offered to him lies with him; whether he will 
once more take the path into neurosis, whether his Ego-develop- 
ment permits his taking the opposite way to extensive instinc- 
tual gratification, or whether he will achieve the mean between 
the two, a "real synthesis of the two forces within him. We 

1 This guidance offers other advantages to the analyst as well. It makes 
the application of Ferenczi's "active therapy" possible, the suppression of 
individual symptoms, which then go to dam up libido so that more abundant 
material should be brought up into analysis. 



^O THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

cannot force the parents of our small patients, either, to take a 
reasonable course with the child when it is returned to them. 
The analysis of children is no insurance against all the mis- 
chances which the child's future may hold. It works above all 
on the past; thereby indeed it provides a cleared and improved 
ground for future development. 

From the conditions which I have described you will have 
gleaned an important clue as to the indications for the analysis 
of children. These indications are not comprised solely in the 
fact of the child having a certain malady. The analysis of 
children belongs essentially in the analytical milieu, and must 
for the present be confined to the children of analysts or %f 
people who have been analysed or regard analysis with a certain 
confidence and respect. Only so can the transition from the 
period of treatment back to home education be accomplished 
without a break. Where a child's analysis cannot be organically 
grafted onto the rest of its life, but is intruded like a disturbing 
foreign body into its other relationships, more conflicts for 
the child may be created than can be resolved by the treatment. 
This, I am afraid, is another disappointment. 

But after telling you so much about the limitations of the 
analysis of children, I should not like to close without saying 
something of the considerable possibilities which it seems to 
me to hold, in spite of all its difficulties, and even with some 
advantage over the analysis of adults. I will suggest three of 
these. 

We can bring about quite other modifications of character 
in the child than in the adult. The child, who under the influ- 
ence of its neurosis has started out on the path of an abnormal 
character-development, need only retrace its steps a short 
distance in order to find the road which is normal and suited 
to its nature. It has not like the adult built up its whole life, 
chosen its calling, made friends, fallen in love, chosen its ideals, 
all on the basis of its neurotic tendencies. In the "character- 
analysis'* of an adult we must actually shatter his whole life, 
and achieve the impossible, that is undo things already done, 
and not only make ignored mental processes conscious but 
abolish them altogether if we wish for real success. Here the 
analysis of children has an infinite advantage. 



ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN AND THEIR UPBRINGING 5! 

The second possibility concerns influence upon the Super- 
ego. The moderation of its severity is, as you know, one of the 
purposes of the analysis. Here adult analysis encounters the 
greatest difficulties, for it has to contend with the individual's 
oldest and most important love-objects, his parents, which he 
has introjected through identification, and the memory of 
which is protected by filial piety. But in children's cases we 
have to do with living persons, existing in the outer world and 
not enshrined in memory. When we supplement internal work 
by external, and seek to modify, not only the existing identi- 
fications by analysis, but their actual prototypes by ordinary 
efforts, the result is both impressive and surprising. 

The same is true for the third point. In working with an 
adult we have to confine ourselves entirely to helping him to 
adapt himself to his environment. It is far .from us, and in 
fact lies quite outside our intention or our means, to shape his 
surroundings to meet his needs. But with a child we can do 
just this without any great difficulty, A child's needs are simpler 
and easier to fulfil and to oversee; our powers, combined with 
those of the parents, easily suffice under favourable conditions 
to provide for the child just what it requires, or much of it, at 
every stage of its treatment and progressive development. Thus 
we lighten the child's task of adjustment as we endeavour to 
adjust its surroundings. Here again is a double work, from 
within and from without. 

I believe that it is due to these three factors that in the analysis 
of children, in spite of all the difficulties I have recounted, we 
can aim at transformations, improvements, and recoveries 
which are not even to be dreamt of in the analysis of adults. 

Ladies and Gentlemen! I am prepared for the practising 
analysts among you to say, after what they have heard here, 
that my methods with children are so different that they 
cannot be called real analysis at all, but a form of " wild" analysis 
which has borrowed all its expedients from analysis but nowise 
conforms to strict analytical principles. But consider: If an 
adult neurotic came to your consulting room to ask for treat- 
ment, and on closer examination proved as impulsive, as un- 
developed intellectually, and as deeply dependent on his environ- 
ment as are my child patients, you would probably say, " Freud- 



52 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

ian analysis is a fine method, but it is not designed for such 
people." And you would treat the patient by a mixed method, 
giving him as much pure analysis as he can stand and for the 
rest children's analysis because, owing to his infantile nature, 
he would merit nothing better. 

In my opinion, there can 'be no detraction to the analytical 
method, designed as it is for a single particular object, the adult 
neurotic, if one seeks to apply it with modifications to other 
sorts of object. There is no harm in contriving to use it for other 
purposes. Only one should be at pains to know what one is 
doing. 



PART II 



The Theory of Children's Analysis 
(1927) 



The Theory of Children j Analysis 

Ladies and Gentlemen. In recent years the psycho-analysis 
of children has attracted greatly increased interest. This is 
mainly due to three factors. It brings welcome confirmation 
of the conceptions as to the mental life of children which psycho- 
analytical theory has formulated from adult analysis over the 
course of years; it supplies new disclosures to round out these 
ideas from direct observation ; and finally it furnishes a transition 
to a sphere of application which, as many think) should in the 
future be one of the most important for psychoanalysis : to 
pedagogics, or the science of upbringing and education. 

But, supported by these three claims to be of service, the 
analysis of children presumes to take various liberties. It calls 
for a new technique. There can be no real objection to 
this, for even the most conservative will admit that altered 
problems must be attacked by modified methods. And so there 
emerges Melanie Klein's play-technique for small children, 
and later the ideas propounded by me for analysis of the latency 
period. But some exponents of the analysis of children, and I 
among them, go even further. They are beginning to concern 
themselves with reflections as to whether the processes in^ a 
child's analysis are fully in accordance with those in an adult's, 
and whether the two fully coincide, so far as aim and end are 
concerned. They think that the children's analyst, just because 
the patient is a child, should have besides the analytical school- 
ing and outlook a second the educational. I do not see why 
we should be frightened of this word, or regard such a com- 
pound of two attitudes as a disparagement or analysis. It will 
be worth while to test the validity of this view in the light of 
some examples. 

My first instance is from the analysis of an eleven-year-old 
boy. When the treatment began he was of the feminine- 
masochistic type, his original object-relationship with his 
mother being entirely overlaid by identification with her. 



56 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

His original masculine aggressiveness found relief only 
occasionally in hostile manifestations towards his brothers 
and sisters and delinquent acts, which were followed by 
violent fits of repentance and depression. In this period of 
his analysis he was preoccupied, in numerous ideas, fantasies 
and dreams, with the problem of death, or rather of the infliction 
of death. 

At that time one of his mother's closest friends was very 
ill, and one day his mother received a telegram saying that her 
condition was dangerous. He seized on this for an elaborate 
day-dream. He pretended that a fresh telegram arrived saying 
she was dead. His mother was extremely grieved. Then came 
another telegram she is still alive, it was a mistake. The 
mother rejoiced. And then he fancied telegrams arriving in 
quick succession, always an announcement of death followed 
by another of revival. The fantasy ended with the news that 
the whole thing was a joke which someone has played on the 
mother. It is not difficult to interpret; we see his ambivalence 
clearly expressed, the wish to kill the person loved by his 
mother, and the inability to pursue his idea to its real conclusion. 

Shortly after that, he reported to me the following compulsive 
action. When he sat in the lavatory he had to touch a knob 
which he found in the wall at one side three times with his 
hand; but then he had to repeat the process at once with a 
knob on the other side. This action seemed at first unintelli- 
gible, until the explanation was found next day through a 
fantasy recounted in another connection. He imagined God 
as an old man, seated in the heavenly abode on a great throne. 
To right and left of him were knobs or switches protruding 
from the wall. If he pressed the knobs on one side, someone 
died ; if he pressed one on the other a child -came into the world. 
I think the combination of the compulsive action with the day- 
dream makes further interpretation superfluous. The number 
three is probably to be explained by the number of his brothers 
and sisters. 

Soon afterwards the father of one of the boy's playfellows, 
who was a great friend of his mother, fell ill. The boy heard 
the telephone ring just as he was leaving for his appointment 
with me, and, while with me, constructed the following fantasy: 



THE THEORY OF CHILDREN^ ANALYSIS 57 

His mother had been told that she must go to the invalid's 
house; she went there, entered the sickroom, went up to the 
bed and wished to talk with the patient. But he made no reply, 
and she saw that he was dead. It was a great shock to her. At 
that moment the dead man's little son came in. She called him 
and said "Come here, look, your father is dead." The boy 
came up to the bed and spoke to his father. The father was 
alive and answered him. He turned to my patient's mother 
and said "What is the matter? He is alive." Then she spoke 
again to the father, but again he made no reply and was dead. 
But when the boy came up again and spoke, the father was 
alive again. 

This fantasy is instructive and transparent, and contains 
the interpretation of both the previous ones. We remark that 
the father is dead in his relationship to the mother, but alive 
so far as concerns his relations with the son. While in the 
previous fantasies the ambivalence the wish to kill and to 
bring to life again comprised merely two different reactions 
towards the same person, which must cancel each other out, 
in this one the particularisation of the threatened person (as 
man on the one hand and father on the other) gives the historical 
elucidation of the double attitude. The two impulses clearly 
spring from different phases of the boy's development. The 
death-wish against the father as the rival for the mother's love 
derives from the normal Oepidus phase with its since-repressed 
positive object-love for the mother. Here his masculine aggres- 
sion turns against the father; he must be eliminated, to leave 
the way free for himself. But the other impulse, the wish to 
retain the father, comes on the one hand from the early period 
of the purely admiring and loving attitude to the father, undis- 
turbed as yet by th& rivalry of the Oedipus complex; and on 
the other hand from the phase which here plays the more 
important part of identification with the mother, which had 
replaced the normal Oedipus attitude. Through fear of castra- 
tion, threatening from the father, the boy had surrendered his 
love for the mother and allowed himself to be forced into the 
feminine attitude. From then on he had to try to sustain the 
father as object, of his homosexual love. 

It would be tempting to go further, and describe the transi- 



58 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

tton in the boy from this wish to kill to a fear of death which 
manifested itself each evening; and so to find a key to the com- 
plicated structure of this neurosis of the latency period. But 
that is no part of my present purpose. I have only mentioned 
this fragment to show that this part of the analysis of a child 
differs in no wise from that of an adult. We have to free a part 
of this boy's masculine aggressiveness from repression, and 
from the overlay of his present feminine-masochistic character 
and mother-identification. The conflict involved is an inner 
one. The fear of his real father in the outer world originally 
drove him into carrying out the repression, but the success of 
this achievement depends for its maintenance upon inner 
forces. The father has been "introjected", the Super-ego has 
become the representative of his power, and the fear of him is 
felt by the boy as castration anxiety. At every step which the 
analysis takes on the path towards making conscious the re- 
pressed Oedipus tendencies, it encounters outbreaks of this 
castration anxiety as an obstacle. Only the laborious historico- 
analytical dissolution of this Super-ego will permit an advance 
in my work of liberation. The work and attitude of the treat- 
ment are, so far as this part of the problem is concerned, purely 
analytical. There is no place here for an educational admixture. 
But in contrast listen to another example from the analysis 
of the six-year-old obsessional little girl. Here again, it is a 
matter of the impulses of the Oedipus complex, and here again 
the idea of killing plays a part. The little girl had, as the analysis 
disclosed, gone through a time of early passionate love for her 
father, and in the usual way had been disappointed in him by 
the birth of the next child. Her reaction to that was extra- 
ordinarily strong. She surrendered the barely achieved genital 
phase In favour of a full regression to anal^sadism. She turned 
her hostility against the new arrival. She made an effort, 
having turned her love almost completely away from her 
father, at least to retain him by incorporation. But her en- 
deavours to feel herself a man struck upon the rivalry with an 
elder brother, whom she recognised to be better equipped 
bodily for this role. The result was an intensified hostility 
towards the mother hatred of her, because she had taken the 
father from her; hatred, because she had not made her a boy; 



THE THEORY OF CHILDREN'S ANALYSIS 9 

and finally hatred, because she had borne the child whom my 
little patient herself would willingly have brought into the 
world. But at this point somewhere in her fourth year 
something decisive occurred. She perceived dimly that she 
was on the way to losing through these hate-reactions, the 
loving relationship which from early childhood she had enjoyed 
with her still dearly-loved mother. And in order to rescue her 
love for her mother, and still more her own position of being 
loved by her, she made a mighty effort to be "good". She 
split off, as it were with one stroke, all these hatreds, and with 
them her whole sexual life with its anal and sadistic habits and 
fantasies; and set this over against her own personality as 
something foreign to it, no longer native, something "devil- 
ish". What was left behind was not much: a small and limited 
person, whose emotional life was not fully at her disposal, and 
whose great intelligence and energy were occupied in holding 
the "devil" beneath the repression placed on it. For the outside 
world, she had at best only lukewarm feelings of tenderness 
towards her mother, not strong enough to bear even the slightest 
strain, and otherwise an almost complete lack of interest. But 
even so the devil occasionally overpowered her for a short 
time, so that it might happen that without any real occasion 
(externally) she would throw herself down on the ground 
and shriek, in a fashion which earlier would certainly have 
been dubbed possessed; or she would suddenly yield and 
revel with full satisfaction in sadistic fantasies, imagining 
that she wandered through her parents' house from top to 
bottom smashing all that she found and throwing the pieces 
out of the window, and striking off the heads of all the people 
she met. Such victories of the devil were always followed by 
anxiety and remorse. But the split-off evil had yet another way 
of manifesting itself, even more dangerous. The "devil" liked 
excrement and dirt; she herself began gradually to develop a 
particular anxiety as to the punctilious observance of the pre- 
cepts of cleanliness. Beheading was a matter dear to the devil's 
heart; she then at a certain time in the morning must creep to 
the beds of her brothers and sisters to ascertain whether they 
were all still alive. The devil transgressed every human law 
with energy and relish; she however developed a fear of 



60 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

quake which came on in the evenings before going to sleep 
for someone had given her the idea that earthquakes are the 
most effective means God uses to punish people on the earth. 
So in everyday life she engrossed herself more and more with 
reaction' formations, acts of contrition, and reparation for the 
deeds of the split-off wickedness. The mighty and urgent 
effort, to retain her mother's love and to be socially conform- 
able and "good", had come lamentably to grief; it had simply 
resulted in a compulsion-neurosis. 

But I have not claimed your attention for this infantile 
neurosis because of its fine structure and the unusual sharpness, 
for this early age, with which the symptoms are circumscribed, 
I have described it because of a particular circumstance which 
emerged during the therapeutical work. 

In the previous example the motor force of the repression 
was castration-anxiety relating to the father; naturally this 
operated as the main resistance in the analysis. But the analysis 
of the little girl worked differently. The repression or rather 
the splitting of the child's personality had come into being 
under the pressure of anxiety as to loss of love. The anxiety 
must have been very intense, to have such a disturbing effect 
on the child's whole life. But in this case this motivating anxiety 
did not operate in the analysis as a serious resistance. Under 
the effect of my uniform friendly interest the. little patient 
began to disclose her "bad" side to me quite calmly and natur- 
ally. You may think that that was nothing out of the way. 
Often enough we meet adult patients who anxiously conceal 
their symptoms from the world, and only begin to disclose them 
in the secure and uncriticising atmosphere of analysis; who, 
indeed, often only recognise them there for the first time. 
But this only refers to the ' description of the symptoms ; the 
friendly interest and absence of expected criticism never 
suffice to induce alteration of them. This however was just 
what happened here. When to my interest and lack of con- 
demnation there was added a relaxation of the, strict home 
discipline, there suddenly occurred a change of anxiety into 
the wish concealed beneath it, of a reaction-formation into the 
rejected instinct, and of a precaution into the underlying death- 
threat. The anxiety as to loss of love ? which should have opposed 



THE THEORY OF CHILDREN'S ANALYSIS 6 1 

itself in violent outbreaks to such a situation, was hardly mani- 
fest at all. The resistance from that cause was slighter than 
from any other. It was as though the little girl were saying "If 
you do not think it so bad, then f do not either," And with 
this diminution of her own demands on herself she gradually 
accomplished, in the course of the analysis, a progressive 
reincorporation of all the impulses which previously she had 
put away with such expenditure of effort: the incestuous love 
for her father, the wish to be masculine, the death-wishes 
against brothers and sisters, the acknowledgement of her 
childish sexuality; and only paused with the single serious 
resistance for a time before what seemed to her the worst of all, 
the acknowledgement of the direct death-wish against her 
mother. 

That is not the behaviour which we have learned to expect 
from a Super-ego. We have learned from the adult neurotic 
how inaccessible to reason the Super-ego is, how steadfastly 
it resists every attempt at external influence, and how it will 
not consent to modify its demands until we have historically 
dissected it in analysis and traced back every single command 
and prohibition to the identification with one of the persons 
who loomed large and were loved in childhood. 

I believe that we have come here upon the main and most 
important difference between the analysis of adults and that of 
children. Take the situation in adult analysis, where the Super- 
ego has already achieved its independence. Here our sole task 
is to raise all the impulses deriving from the Id, the Ego and 
the Super-ego, which partook in the formation of the neurotic 
conflict, to the same level by bringing them into consciousness, 
On this new conscious level the conflict can then be carried on 
in a new way and brought to another outcome. But in the 
analysis of children we deal with cases where the Super-ego 
has not yet arrived at any real independence; where it operates 
all too clearly for the sake of those from whom it holds its 
commission, the parents and persons in charge of the child, 
and is swayed in its demands by every change in the relation- 
ship with these people and by all the alterations that may occur 
in their own outlook. We work, as with adults, by pur analysis, 
in so far as it is a matter of freeing the already repressed part 



62, THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

of the Id and the Ego. But the task with the childish Super-ego 
is a double one. It is analytical in the historical dissolution of 
the Super-ego, so far as it is already an Independent structure, 
from within, but it is also educational (in the widest sense of 
that word) in exercising outward influence, by modifying the 
relations with those who are bringing up the child, creating 
new impressions, and revising the demands made on the child 
by the outside world. 

To return to my little obsessional patient. Had she not come 
under treatment at six-years-old her infantile neurosis might 
-perhaps, like so many others, have cleared up of itself. As heir 
to it a strict Super-ego would certainly have been raised up, 
which would have presented rigid demands to the Ego and 
would have opposed to any later analysis a resistance difficult 
to overcome. But the view which I put forward is that this 
strict Super-ego stands at the outcome and not at the inception 
of the infantile neurosis. 

As a further illustration of what I have said I refer to a 
communication which Dr. M. W. Wulff has published. (73.) 
He reports phobic attacks of anxiety in a little girl aged only 
one and a half. Clearly in this case the child's parents had 
tried too early to make it form habits of cleanliness. The little 
child could not come up to their requirements and became 
upset, imagining that she would be sent away. Her anxiety 
became acute in the dark or when there were sounds, for 
instance if someone knocked at the door. She constantly 
asked whether she was good and kept repeating the plea not 
to be sent away. The worried parents turned to Dr. Wulff 
for advice. 

The interesting point about this early symptom is that the 
infant's anxiety, which Dr. Wulff at once recognised as fear 
of loss of love, is in no way distinguishable from the guilt- 
feelings of an adult neurotic. Must we however in this case 
give credence to so early a development of conscience, and thus 
of the Super-ego? 

Dr, Wulff explained to the parents that the little girl clearly 
could not yet for some reason carry out the requirements of 
cleanliness, and advised them to postpone for a time her educa- 
tion in this respect. They were understanding enough to com- 



THE THEORY OF CHILDREN'S ANALYSIS 63 

ply; they explained to the child that they still loved her when 
she wetted herself, and they tried whenever that happened to 
allay her fears with renewed reassurances. The result as Dr. 
Wulff described it was striking. After a few days the child was 
calm and free from anxiety. 

Such "therapy" is naturally only possible very seldom and 
with very small children. I do not want to suggest that it is 
the only possible one. But Dr. Wulff has here afforded a proof 
by cure, which permits a positive conclusion as to the play of 
forces at the root of the anxiety. If the child's anxiety had been 
due to the Super-ego's demands, the parents' reassurances 
would have had hardly any influence on her symptom. If 
however the cause of her anxiety was the real fear of the dis- 
pleasure of her parents, actually existing in the outside world, 
and not of an inward image of them, then it is easily to be 
understood that the symptom could be removed. Dr. Wulff 
had in fact removed its cause. 

The Super-ego's accessibility to influence in early years 
accounts for many of the direct modifications which can be 
brought about in a young child's behaviour. Through the 
good offices of Dr. Ferenczi, I have had access to the notes of a 
teacher in a modern American school^ the Walden School. 
She describes how neurotic children from strict homes ? who 
come to school while still of kindergarten age, after a first 
period of surprise and suspicion become acclimatised to the 
free atmosphere and gradually lose their neurotic symptoms, 
which are usually reactions to the breaking off of masturbation. 
A similar result would be impossible in the case of an adult 
neurotic. The freer the surroundings into which he is trans- 
planted, the stronger his anxiety in respect of the instinct, and 
the stronger his neurotic defence reactions, i.e. his symptoms. 
The demands which his Super-ego lays upon him are no 
longer open to influence from his surroundings. On the other 
hand, the child, when the mitigation of its Super-ego's demands 
once has begun, is apt to go to extremes, and to indulge itself 
further than even the freest environemnt is ready to permit. 
The exercise of external influence is again necessary. 

In conclusion, one more example. A little while ago I over- 
heard a conversation between a five-year-old boy and his 



64 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

mother. The child had taken the fancy to wish for a live horse; 
his mother on good grounds opposed the fulfilment of this, 
desire. "It doesn't matter," said he, not at all cast down, "I'll 
wish for it for my next birthday." His mother told him that 
even then he could not have it. "Then I'll wish for it at Christ- 
mas/' he said, "one gets anything then/* "No, not even at 
Christmas/' said his mother, trying to disabuse him. "Well it 
still doesn't matter," said he triumphantly, "I shall buy it 
myself, for I allow myself to have it" This is a clear illustration 
of the conflict which arises when an inner permission is con- 
fronted by a prohibition from without. If they are fortunate, 
children will adapt themselves to frustration ; if not, the out- 
come may be rebellion and delinquency, or neurosis. 

Yet one word more on the "educational" function of the 
children's analyst. Since we have found that the forces with 
which we have to contend in the cure of an infantile neurosis 
are not only internal, but partly external as well, we have a 
right to require that the children's analyst should correctly 
"assess the external situation in which the child stands; just as 
we ask that he should measure and comprehend its inner 
situation. For this part of his task however the children's 
analyst needs theoretical and practical knowledge of children's 
training and upbringing. This enables him to look into and 
criticise the educational influence under which the child is 
being brought up ; and, if it should prove necessary, to take the 
child's upbringing out of the hands of those in charge, and for 
the period of the analysis undertake it himself. 



PART III 

Indications for Child Analysis 
(1945) 



INTRODUCTION 



1 . The sexual prejudice. 

2. The fear of immorality as a consequence of child analysis. 

3. Controversies about technique. 
Controversies concerning the appropriate age. 
Controversies concerning the range of application. 



THE EVALUATION OF INFANTILE NEUROSES 

1 . Selection of Cases. 

(a) The factor of neurotic suffering. 

(b) The factor of disturbance of normal capacities. 

(c) The factor of disturbance of normal development. 

2. "Libidinal Development 

(a) The sequence of libidinal development. 

(b) The intactness of libidinal development. 

(c) Neurotic interference with libidinal development; 

the factor of spontaneous recovery. 

3. Neurotic Interference with Ego-Developmetft 

(a) The quantitative factor, 
(h) The qualitative factor. 

CONCLUSION 



INTRODUCTION 

Since 1905, when a phobia in a five-year-old boy was first 
treated by psycho-analysis the father acting as intermediary 
between child and analyst child analysis as a therapeutic 
method has had a stormy and much chequered career (74). 
There is hardly a point in it which has remained uncontested, 
or which has not, at some time or other, become the starting- 
point for controversy. 

In some respects child-analysis revived the same objections 
which the psycho-analytic treatment of adults had to meet and 
overcome a full decade earlier. 

1. The sexual prejudice 

At the end of the last century the conception of a sexual 
origin of adult .neurosis ran counter to all the prejudices of 
that age. But, though medical and lay opinion would not 
concede to adult sexuality the pathogenic importance which 
it deserved, no one went so far as to deny its existence alto- 
gether; everybody on the other hand violently objected to 
the possible existence of a sexual life in childhood. Psycho- 
analysis had laid itself open to the reproach of over-estimating 
the role of sexuality in the adult, and, similarly, to a charge of 
inventing an infantile sex life, contrary to the facts then known 
and accepted by the medical world and in educational circles. 
Thus the existence of an infantile sexuality had to be established 
and proved at the same time as the role of such a sexual life 
for the neuroses of childhood had to be demonstrated (75), 

2. The fear of immorality as a consequence of psycho-analytic 

treatment 

A second argument which was originally used against the 
analytic treatment of adult neurotics was based on a mis- 
conception of the psycho-analytic process itself. It was thought 
that the constant preoccupation with instinctive tendencies 
which is inherent in the analytic work ? the release of these 



68 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

tendencies from repression, and their consequent rising up to 
consciousness could have one effect only: their expression in 
actions, i.e. the fulfilment of the instinctive (sexual and aggres- 
sive) wishes which had been kept under restraint before the 
treatment. Psycho-analytical treatment would thus lead 
directly to immorality and licentiousness. It had needed much 
patient and lengthy demonstration to convince the public 
that this was not the case ; that, on the contrary, far from becom- 
ing more potent, unconscious tendencies were deprived of 
most of their power when an outlet into conscious thought was 
opened up for them. Relegated to the unconscious these 
instinctive urges had been out of reach; unearthed, and lifted 
to the conscious level they automatically came under the 
control of the patient's mind and could be dealt with according 
to his ideas and ideals. 

The same objections which had been successfully refuted 
with regard to adult patients rose up again in full force when 
child-analysis made its first appearance. The argument was 
this time that surely the childish mind could not be trusted 
with the same discretion in dealing with its reawakened 
instinctive tendencies as the adult one. Surely the child would 
want to make full use of the licence offered to it in the analytic 
situation and give free rein to its instinctive urges inside and 
outside of the analytic hour. Or even if its intentions were 
otherwise, its attempts at restraint and adapted behaviour 
would be simply overrun by the instinctive forces let loose 
through the agency of analytic treatment. Fears of this kind 
were expressed not only by doctors, teachers and parents, but 
were shared to a degree by some analysts who thought it 
quite possible that child-analysis might need some special 
form of educational guidance as its constant accompaniment 
and counterpart. But, as experience proved, this was not 
as often necessary as had been expected. It was demonstrated 
repeatedly that the ego and super-ego of a child which were 
consistent and severe enough to produce an infantile neurosis 
could also,, with sonje help, be relied on to deal with the sexual 
and aggressive impulses which emerged from repression after 
the neurosis had been analysed successfully. Fears of this 
nature are more justified where the object of child-analysis is 



INDICATIONS FOR CHILD ANALYSIS 69 

not a neurotic, but a dissocial, delinquent, or otherwise de- 
ficient character. 

3. Controversies about the technique of child-analysis 

It became obvious immediately that the classical analytical 
technique was not applicable to children, at least not before 
the age of puberty, or at best pre-puberty. Free association, 
the mainstay of analytic technique, had to be counted out as 
a method; young children are neither willing nor able to 
embark on it. This has its consequences for the second main 
road to the unconscious, namely dream-interpretation. Children 
tell their dreams freely; but without the use of free association 
the interpretation of the manifest dream content is less fruitful 
and convincing. The child-analyst frequently has to supply 
the links between the manifest dream content and the latent 
dream thoughts according to his own intimate knowledge of 
the child's inner situation at the time of dreaming. It is, further, 
impossible to establish the same outward setting for the analytic 
hour. Children cannot be placed on the analytic couch for the 
purpose of relaxed concentration without this having the 
effect of silencing them completely. Talk and action cannot be 
separated from each other in their case. Nor can the patient's 
Family be wholly excluded from the analysis. Insight into the 
seriousness of the neurosis, the decision to begin and to continue 
treatment, persistence in the face of resistance or of passing 
aggravations of the illness are beyond the child, and have to 
be supplied by the parents. In child-analysis the parents* good 
sense plays the part which the healthy part of the patient's 
conscious personality plays during adult analysis to safeguard 
and maintain the continuance of treatment. 

To establish techniques which were adapted to the varying 
needs of the different phases of childhood, it became above 
all necessary to create appropriate substitutes for free associa- 
tion. The first divergence of opinion between child-analysts 
arose about this matter. Certain child-analysts (Hug-Hellmuth 
in Vienna, Melanie Klein in Berlin and later in London) 
developed the so-called play technique of child-analysis, a 
method which promised to give more or less direct access to 
the child's unconscious. In this technique, for free association 



JO THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

was substituted the spontaneous play-activity of the child, 
carried out on small toy material which was offered by the 
analyst for free use within the analytic hour. The individual 
actions of the child in connection with this material were 
considered to be equivalent to the individual thoughts or 
images in a chain of free association. In this manner the pro- 
duction of material for interpretation became largely inde- 
pendent of the child's willingness or ability to express itself 
in speech. 

Other child-analysts (on the European continent and in 
the United States) were reluctant to employ this play technique 
to the same extent. This method of interpretation, though 
allowing as if in flashes a certain amount of direct insight into 
the child's unconscious, seemed to them to be open to objec- 
tions of various kinds. Like all interpretation of symbols (for 
instance purely symbolical dream-interpretation) it has a 
tendency to become rigid, impersonal and stereotyped with 1 
out being open to corroboration from the child; it aimed 
at laying bare the deeper layers of the child's mind without 
working through the resistances and distortions of the pre- 
conscious and of consciousness. Furthermore they refused to 
accept these activities as real equivalents of free association. 
The free associations of the adult patient are produced in the 
set situation of analytic transference and, though freed from 
the usual restrictions of logical and conscious thought, are 
under the influence of one governing aim; that of being cured 
by analysis. The play activity of the child is not governed by 
any similar intention. This leads to the further, open and con- 
troversial question whether the relationship of the child to the 
analyst is really governed exclusively by a transference situa- 
tion. Even if one part of the child's neurosis is transformed 
into a transference neurosis, in the manner in which this 
happens in adult analysis, another part of the child's neurotic 
reactions remains grouped around the parents who are the 
original objects of the pathogenic past. It was due to consider- 
ations of this nature that a large number of child-analysts 
evolved techniques of a different kind. They worked on the 
various derivatives of the child's unconscious in day- and 
night-dreams, in imaginative play^ in drawings, etc T , including 



INDICATIONS FOR CHILD ANALYSIS 71 

the emotional reactions of the child, inside and outside of the 
analytic hour. The task was, as in adult analysis, to undo the 
various repressions, distortions, displacements, condensations, 
etc., which had been brought about by the neurotic defence- 
mechanisms, until, with the active help of the child, the un- 
conscious content of the material was laid bare. Such co- 
operation with the child naturally presupposes the extensive 
use of speech. 

Detailed accounts of the two different types of child-analysis 
are contained in Melanie Klein's The Psycho-Analysis of Children 
(5), and in my Introduction to the Technique of the Analysis of 
Children (4). 

The method of symbolic interpretation of play activity which 
Melanie Klein had devised for her technique was later taken 
over by psychotherapy and widely used in England and 
America under the name of "play-therapy". But in these 
instances it was deprived of its full original meaning, since 
it was used without reference to an analytical transference 
situation, 

4, Controversies concerning the appropriate age for child-analysis 
Differences in the manner in which child-analysis was 
carried out inevitably led to differences concerning the age at 
which the therapeutic method was applicable. The decisive 
factor in this respect was the use of speech. Melanie Klein 
and her followers repeatedly expressed the opinion .that, with 
the help of the play technique, children can be analysed at 
almost any age, from earliest infancy onwards. When the 
faculty of speech in the child is of major importance for the 
treatment, it is hardly possible to contemplate analysis before 
the age of two or three. The majority of cases treated with 
these latter techniques were considerably older than that; 
many of them were analysed atti^^ 
complex (four or fi ye j[2^ 5 or m ^ e ' a ^ eiic 7 period. 

5* Controversies concerning the range of application of child-analysis 
Here again a wide difference of opinion exists between the 
school of Melanie Klein and the former Vienna school of child- 
analysts, many of whom are at present working in America. 



7& THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

The English child-analysts express the view that every child 
passes in its infancy through phases of grave abnormality 
(psychotic states, depressions, etc.), and that normal develop- 
ment in later stages can best be safeguarded by early child- 
analysis, by analysing the psychotic residues of the earliest 
stage whenever outward circumstances permit. The former 
Vienna school on the other hand is of the opinion that the 
application of child-analysis may well be restricted to the most 
severe cases of the infantile neurosis through which every 
child normally passes at one time or other before entering the 
latency period. With all other children, the application of 
analytical knowledge to their educational handling may prove 
sufficient to guide them through the intricacies of their in- 
stinctual and emotional development. 



THE EVALUATION OF INFANTILE NEUROSES 

I . Selection of cases 

Those who do not share the opinion that analysis should 
be universally applied to all children are faced with the task of 
selecting their cases, that is of assessing the seriousness of 
the various manifestations of infantile neurosis. In practice 
child-analysts of to-day have little opportunity of determining 
this matter by their own judgment. The question whether or 
not a child should be analysed is usually decided for them, and 
frequently enough on inadequate reasons. Children who are 
severely ill are often withheld from treatment because their 
parents, with whom the decision lies, know too little about 
analysis, or are frightened of the little which they know; 
because the parents are reluctant to have the intimacies of 
their own lives exposed to the analyst; because they fear the 
sexual enlightenment of the child; because they, especially 
the mothers, are unwilling to see a stranger succeed with their 
child where they themselves have failed. Sometimes the 
reasons given are very superficial : analytic hours would clash 
with school hours ; would take up the time otherwise given to 
sport or handicraft, or some other occupation, from which the 
child usually has ceased to benefit owing to its neurotic disturb- 



INDICATIONS FOR CHILD ANALYSIS 73 

ance. The most decisive factor is frequently the geographical 
one. To accompany a child to and from a daily analytical hour 
is a heavy burden on the mother ; where long distances aggravate 
the issue, this factor is often prohibitive. 

On the other hand, a number of children are sent into 
analysis, not because they suffer from an excessive form of 
infantile neurosis, but because their parents, either as analytic 
patients themselves, or as practising analysts, are more apt 
than others to detect and evaluate signs of neurotic behaviour 
whenever they appear. They readily decide for analytic 
treatment at an early stage to avoid for their child the graver 
forms of neurotic suffering which they know only too well 
from personal experience. Their positive decision for treat- 
ment, like the above mentioned negative ones, is based rather 
on a personal attitude than on an objective assessment of the 
child's disturbance. 

The child cases actually in treatment in our day, either 
in child departments of the psycho-analytic clinics or in private 
practice, are thus a more or less chance selection, not a repre- 
sentative selection of infantile neuroses which are most in 
need of therapeutic help. It is to be expected that these condi- 
tions will change when knowledge about the mental develop- 
ment of the young child becpmes more widespread, that is, 
when parents understand at least as much about the importance 
of instinctual, emotional or intellectual setbacks in the child's 
development as they understand now about its bodily illnesses. 
The assessment of the disturbance and the decision whether 
treatment is indicated or not will then bp left to the psych- 
ologist or psycho-analyst, as it is nowadays left to the pedia- 
trician in all cases of organic disturbance. 

(a) The factor of neurotic suffering 

The question whether or not an adult neurotic seeks treat- 
ment is in the last resort dependant on the amount of suffering 
which his neurotic symptoms cause him. For this reason 
neurotics undergo treatment more willingly than for instance^ 
perverts. A perversion disrupts normal life as much as a 
neurosis. But the perversion brings satisfaction whereas 
l^eurotic symptoms are painful , 



74 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

This statement can be upheld in spite of the fact that every 
neurosis is also a source of pleasure for the individual who is 
afflicted by it. The pleasure which the patient derives from the 
distorted gratification of repressed wishes, that is from his 
symptoms, is not 'experienced as pleasure by his conscious 
system. The conscious pleasure, on the other hand, which 
neurotics often enjoy "owing to the consideration which they 
receive from their environment, a sense of importance, etc,, 
is of a secondary nature and not really inherent in the illness. 
Whenever this secondary gain from the illness becomes greater 
than the neurotic suffering itself, the patient will be unfit for 
treatment, or will in most cases quite openly refuse to be 
treated. The existence of neurotic suffering is, if not indis- 
pensable, at least an important prerequisite for the attitude of 
persistence and determination which a patient needs to carry 
him through the difficulties of an analytic cure. 

In dealing with cases of infantile neurosis one realises that 
neurotic suffering is not present in the child to the same degree, 
and that, wherever it is present, it is equally divided between 
child and parents. In some instances it is only the reaction of 
the parents to the symptom which, secondarily, brings home 
to the child that it suffers from a symptom, This is, for instance 
the case in the frequent feeding disturbances of childhood. 
Children become bad eaters for reasons which originate in 
their early mother-relationship, in their reactions against their 
oral-sadistic and their anal-sadistic tendencies, etc. The 
normal intake of food is thus made difficult or impossible for 
neurotic reasons. The child, left to itself, would gladly put 
up with this symptom and eat less. Mothers, on the other hand, 
suffer acutely from anxiety caused by this behaviour of the 
child and, in their turn, inflict suffering on the bad eater through 
reproaches, scoldings, forcible measures, etc. The same occurs 
in the neurotic bed-wetting of childhood. Children under a 
certain age tend to show indifference towards this symptom 
while the adult environment suffers badly on its account; the 
amount of pain which it causes the child depends on the 
reaction of the environment. The night terrors of children 
(pavor nocturnus) usually cause consternation and anxiety to 
the parents while the afflicted child itself remains oblivious of 



INDICATIONS FOR CHILD ANALYSIS 75 

them. Temper tantrums are disturbing for the family; for the 
child itself they are often a welcome outlet. Neurotic display 
of aggression and destructiveness, as they occur in the initial 
stages of an obsessional neurosis, are most disturbing symp- 
toms for the family; the child rather indulges in them. Its 
attitude in that respect resembles more closely that of an adult 
pervert than of an adult neurotic. 

Acute neurotic suffering is felt by the child in all states of 
anxiety before a consistent defence against it has set in. When 
anxiety is once warded off, either by phobic or by obsessional 
mechanisms, how much the child suffers depends agaia on the 
behaviour of the environment. Many mothers fear the child's 
anxiety as much as the child does himself. Consequently 
they not only do not oppose the child's phobic or obsessional 
arrangements, they even help actively and in many ways to 
uphold them. They help the child to avoid the danger situa- 
tions in which anxiety would arise ; they fall in with bed-time 
ceremonials, with eating, dressing and washing obsessions, 
etc. Their object is to spare the child the suffering inherent 
in the^anxiety, and simultaneously to avoid the violent out- 
breaks which follow whenever an obsessional act or phobic 
precaution is opposed or prevented. There are thus many 
infantile phobias and obsessional neuroses which exist under 
the surface and, though causing endless trouble for the mother, 
are not felt as acutely painful by the child. 

(During the time of mass evacuation in England, 1940, 
many children became neurotic sufferers after separation from 
their parents. It would be- erroneous to conclude that they had 
acquired a neurosis due to their traumatic experiences. In 
many cases their neurosis had merely not been in evidence 
while they lived with their mothers, and acute anxiety, suffering, 
etc., appeared when they had to live with people who were less 
willing or able to show consideration for their phobic and 
obsessional arrangements.) 

To sum up : the presence or absence of suffering cannot be 
counted on as a decisive factor when making up one's mind 
about the treatment of a child. There are many serious neurotic 
disorders which the child bears with equanimity; there are less 
serious ones which cause pain. Since the decision to seek 



76 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

advice for the child normally lies with the parents, an infantile 
neurosis is more likely to come into treatment when its symp- 
toms are disturbing to the environment. The parents will be 
guided in their assessment of the seriousness of the situation 
by the impact of the child's neurosis on themselves. They 
show more concern, for instance, about aggressive and destruc- 
tive states than about inhibitions; obsessional acts are taken 
more lightly than anxiety attacks, though in reality they repre- 
sent a more advanced stage of the same disorder; bed-wetters 
are taken to clinics more regularly than any other category of 
cases; the beginning stages of passive feminity in young boys, 
though often decisive for their whole future abnormality, are 
almost invariably overlooked. 

(b) The factor of disturbance of 'normal capacities 

An adult neurosis is not only assessed subjectively according 
to suffering, but objectively according to the extent to which 
it damages the main capacities of the individual : the capacity 
to lead a normal love and sex life, and the capacity to work. 
Patients usually decide to come into treatment when*one or 
the other of these functions, or both, are severely threatened. 

The question arises whether there are any functions in the 
child's life, the disturbance of which is an equally significant 
indicator for the seriousness of the infantile neurosis. 

The child's love and sex life is, as psycho-analysis has shown, 
not less extensive and certainly not less intensive than that of 
the adult. But, after the first severe repressions of early child- 
hood have occurred, it is inhibited in its aims. Though centred 
according to objects (Oedipus complex), it is diffuse in its 
manifestations (component instincts), not organised under the 
primacy of any single one of them, It furthermore lacks a 
climax in its expressions, the disturbance of which could be 
taken as indicative of disturbance of function. The child is, 
according to the nature of its sex organisation, impotent, 
which means that the intactness of its sexuality is more difficult 
to gauge than with an adult. To measure its capacity for object* 
love we can only measure its libidinal urges directed towards 
the outer world against its narcissistic tendencies. Normally 
after the first year of life object love should outweigh narcissism ; 



INDICATIONS FOR CHILD ANALYSIS JJ 

satisfaction derived from objects should become increasingly 
greater than autoerotic gratification. An infantile neurosis can 
seriously interfere with these proportions. But the assessment 
of these factors in the diagnosis is too subtle and too complicated 
to be of immediate help as an indication for treatment. 

It is equally difficult to find in the child's life a parallel for 
the disturbance of working capacity. It has been suggested 
by many authors that play is as important for the child as work 
is for the adult, and that consequently a test of the child's ability 
to play is highly suggestive for the extent of its disturbance. 
This view seems to be borne out by the fact that neurotic 
children are invariably disturbed in their play activity. With 
certain types of neurosis imaginative play is excessive, at the 
expense of constructive play. In its initial stages this is some- 
times taken as an asset by the parents, as the sign of a specially 
vivid imagination and of artistic gifts. But the neurotic element 
is unmistakable when such play becomes repetitive, -monoton- 
ous, and interferes with all other kinds of activity. This should 
be taken as a sign that the child is neurotically fixed to a certain- 
point of its libidinal development. 

Although the capacity for constructive play is, in the child's 
life, the nearest substitute for the adult capacity to work, the 
two functions remain so far removed from each other that it 
is hardly justifiable to give them an equal place in the diagnosis. 
Since play is governed by the pleasure principle, and work by 
the reality principle, the disturbance of each of the two func- 
tions has a different clinical significance, 

(c) The factor of disturbance of normal development 

It is thus impracticable to use for the evaluation of an 
infantile neurosis the same criteria which we apply in the case 
of an adult. Childhood is a process sui generis^ a series of 
developmental stages in which each manifestation has its im- 
portance as a transition, not as a final result. Its tasks and 
accomplishments cannot therefore be compared with those of 
the more static stage of adulthood, There is only one factor in 
childhood which has such central importance that its impair- 
ment through a neurosis calls for immediate action: that is the 
child's ability to develop, not to remain fixed to any stage of 



78 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

development before a prescribed ripening process has been 
concluded. The suggestion is therefore to assess the serious- 
ness of an infantile neurosis, not according to the damage which 
it does to the activities or attitudes of the child in any special 
way, or at any given moment, but according to the degree in 
which it prevents the child from developing further. 



2. LIBIDINAL DEVELOPMENT 

(a) The sequence of libidinal development 

On the basis of our present knowledge it is possible, even in 
a cursory examination, to establish whether a child is up to 
its age in its libidinal development. We roughly know the age 
limits for the pregenital organisations of the libido, plus some 
subdivisions within these stages. Gross disturbance in the 
order of events, or failure to move on from any of these transi- 
tory stages in children who are neither organically nor mentally 
deficient, points to serious neurotic interference. 

But wide individual variability, and the scantiness of our 
knowledge, prevent us frofn making anything beyond rough 
estimates on this basis. We have to count, normally, with an 
extensive overlapping between the various organisations. The 
oral phase, for instance, persists for months, after the anal- 
sadistic organisation has come into being; anal-sadistic mani- 
festations do not disappear with the beginning of the phallic 
phase. The latency period is usually in existence for one or 
two years before the tendencies of the first infantile period 
fade into the background. It would, for instance, be erroneous 
to conclude from a continuance of oral or anal forms of auto- 
erotic gratification in the fourth or fifth years, that the child 
has failed to reach the phallic level. It never happens that the 
whole of the libido expresses itself in the manifestations of 
the latest phase of development only; some part of it invariably 
remains attached to earlier modes of expression. To ensure 
normality it is sufficient if the bulk of the libido reaches the 
organisation which is appropriate to the age of the child. The 
manifestations of this level then predominate over the earlier 
ones, though never as fully as the genital tendencies of adult 
sex life predominate over the pregenital tendencies, 



INDICATIONS FOR CHILD ANALYSIS 79 

There are more reliable data on which an opinion about the 
libidinal development of a child could, theoretically, be based: 
namely the fantasies which accompany the child's masturba- 
tory activities. But, practically, this is of little help for the 
diagnosis. Such fantasies are always hidden, very frequently 
unconscious, and only laid bare in the course of an analysis, 
not in a consultation. 

(b) The intactness of libidinal development 

The libidinal normality of a child is, further, judged accord- 
ing to the fate of the individual component instincts. We 
would not expect any of the component instincts to be com- 
pletely absent from the clinical picture (if the child is neither 
organically nor mentally deficient) except as a sign of severe 
neurotic disturbance. 

But, again, individual variability is wide enough to warn 
us to be careful in our conclusions. The component instincts 
(including tendencies like exhibitionism, scoptophilia), or 
rather their manifestations, are not visible to the same degree 
in all children; nor does any individual child present us with 
equally clear pictures of all the different libidinal tendencies. 
Usually some of the component instincts are clearly in evidence, 
others remain faint and shadowy. With some children we might 
believe that cruelty, or exhibitionism, or gre'ed, have played 
hardly any part in their lives ; with others these urges are un- 
mistakable, and other instincts are only seen on closer observ- 
ation. Individual differences of this nature are based on con- 
stitutional factors, and are not due to neurotic interference ; but 
they create points of special libidinal interests in the child's 
life, so-called fixation-points, which play an important role in 
later neurotic development. 

(c) Neurotic interference with libidinal development*, the factor of 

spontaneous recovery 

A neurosis in an adult damages the intactness of the indi- 
vidual's sex organisation ; an infantile neurosis interferes besides 
this directly with the forward movement of the libido. 

In the beginning stage of a neurotic conflict the libido, to 
avoid anxiety which has arisen on a higher level of sex organis- 



8O THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

'alien, flows backwards (regression), and attaches' itself once 
more to earlier libidinal wishes (fixation point). The ego of 
the child thus finds itself confronted with primitive desires 
(oral, aggressive, anal), which it is not prepared to tolerate. It 
defends itself against the instinctual danger with the help of 
various mechanisms '(repression, reaction-formation, displace- 
ments, etc.), but, if such defence is unsuccessful, neurotic 
symptoms arise which represent the gratification of the wish, 
distorted in its form by the action of the repressive forces. 
While these symptoms persist, they are the central expression 
of the child's libidinal life. 

From the developmental point of view it is immaterial 
whether such symptoms are a little more or a little less painful. 
What counts is that with the onset of the neurotic disturbance 
the libido has been arrested in its course. Instead of moving 
on towards more adult levels, it has been forced backwards, 
and important gains have thereby been undone. Qualities and 
achievements which depend directly on the stage of libido 
development are lost. The child who regresses to the oral 
level, for instance, simultaneously reverts to the emotional 
attitudes which are connected with it: it becomes once more 
insatiable, exacting, impatient for wishfulfilment, "like a 
baby". Regression from the phallic to the anal-sadistic level 
destroys the hardly acquired attitudes of generosity, manliness 
and protectiveness and substitutes for them the domineering 
possessiveness which belongs to the earlier libidinal level. 
But progress is made at the same time in other spheres which 
are not influenced directly by the neurosis. The child grows 
bigger and more clever, and its development becomes inharmon- 
ious since this growing body and mind are tied to an instinctual 
and emotional life which cannot keep pace with it. The need 
for treatment seems urgent at this stage, not because the neurosis 
is in itself so severe, but because the presence of the neurosis 
hinders libido development. 

On the other hand this impression of a serious hold-up is 
frequently misleading. After a shorter or a longer stay, symp- 
toms may suddenly lose importance; the fixation can dissolve 
and the libido, freed from restrictions, resume its normal pro- 
gressive flow. The child has, as the popular saying goes, "out-, 



INDICATIONS FOR CHILD ANALYSIS 8 I 

grown" its neurosis, and therapeutic help has become un- 
necessary. 

As analysts, who collect their evidence from adult cases, 
we do not readily believe in the spontaneous cure of a neurosis, 
and we view such appearances with distrust when they are 
brought to our notice. We know that neuroses can, at best, 
change their manifestations. Neurotic anxiety for instance 
can disappear, but only to reappear later, centred round a 
different object or topic. Changes in life circumstances can 
alleviate a neurotic condition in various ways. Neurotic suffer- 
ing can be exchanged for ordinary suffering; for instance the 
real loss of an object through death can take the place of the 
imagined loss of love from that object, and thus make a parti- 
cular symptom unnecessary. A masochistic desire, which at 
one time manifests itself in neurotic symptoms, can find satis- 
faction in organic illness at another time. Inhibitions or 
obsessional restrictions which cripple a patient's activity may 
be given up when the same person is, for instance, in prison or 
in a concentration camp, that is, lives under crippling and in- 
hibiting circumstances. A neurosis can further be relieved 
through separation from the love object on to which it has 
transferred its central issues ; but such relief will be temporary, 
and the neurosis will soon re-establish itself completely when 
a new transference has taken place. Happenings of this kind, 
though often described as temporary or permanent spontan- 
eous cures, are merely slight fluctuations within the neurotic 
arrangement itself. 

On the basis of our theoretical knowledge,, there is little 
reason to expect the neuroses of adults to clear up spontan- 
eously. The neurotic symptom, as a compromise between two 
opposing forces, can only alter when decisive changes take 
place, either in the instinctive tendencies or in the ego and 
super-ego of the individual. Neither kind of change is likely 
to happen in the adult. The infantile wish, to which the patient 
has regressed, will remain potent. The ego will keep its repres- 
sive energy (unless a serious deteriorating process sets in). 
Furthermore, the whole process is anchored in the uncon- 
scious, and therefore not accessible to influence from conscious 
levels, 



82 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

This is where conditions in the case of an infantile neurosis 
are, completely different. The child's libido organisation is, as 
described before, in a fluid state., the libido moving on continu- 
ously towards new positions. A component instinct which is 
charged with libido in one phase, may be devoid of interest 
at another. The child need not remain hopelessly tied to any 
fixation-point to which it has been led back through regression. 
If the fixation is not excessively strong, the libido has a good 
chance of freeing itself again, carried forward by the next wave 
of development. This possibility is greatest at times when the 
biological urges are of especial strength, as they are at the onset 
of the phallic phase (four-five years) and of puberty. 

(It is a common error to believe that, due to the strengthening of 
the ego, children become more neurotic in the latency period. On 
the contrary, the latency period marks a definite decrease in infantile 
neurosis. At that time the strength of the infantile sex wishes dies 
down, partly for biological reasons, partly owing to the frustration 
of the child's Oedipus wishes. This lessens the need for defence 
against the instincts and alters the compromise-formations between 
ego and id which lie at the root of symptom formation. Many infantile 
neuroses therefore disappear at approximately that date, their spontan- 
eous cure "being due to these quantitative changes. 

Puberty is rightly regarded as a time when numerous neurotic 
disturbances may be expected to appear. It is less well known that 
puberty also removes certain neurotic symptoms which are typical 
for the years preceding it This refers especially to the neurotic behav- 
iour of boys who, all through early childhood and latency, fight against 
repressed wishes of a passive feminine kind. Their behaviour is char- 
acterised by anxiety, due to their repressed castration wishes, and by a 
superficial and noisy aggressiveness which is a reaction against the 
underlying passivity. Puberty brings a biological increase in genital 
masculinity which, while it lasts, puts the anal, passive and feminine 
tendencies out of action. This is a spontaneous cure in the real sense 
of the word: the neurosis not merely changes its form, but the under- 
lying unconscious forces themselves undergo alterations. It depends 
on future developments whether the former constellation of instincts 
will come to the fore again in aclult life; in this case the neurotic defence 
against it will be re-instated. 

There are other typical examples of infantile neuroses which dis- 
appear almost invariably before adolescence: bed-wetting, and some 



INDICATIONS FOR CHILD ANALYSIS 83 

of the common eating disturbances. They also are swept away by the 
libidinal changes before or in puberty. Certain disorders affecting 
sexual potency, and certain" nervous disorders of the stomach may, 
much later, appear in their stead, if 'the adult genital sex organisation 
is not strong, enough to maintain itself.) 

To sum up : the decision whether a child needs therapeutic 
help or not can be based on the state of the libido development. 
An infantile neurosis can be treated as a transitory disorder so 
long as the libido organisation of the child remains fluid and 
shows progressive tendencies. Infantile neuroses disappear 
whenever the normal forward movement of the libido is strong 
enough to undo neurotic regression and fixation. When the 
libido constellations become rigid, stabilised, and monotonous 
in their expressions the neurosis is in danger of remaining per- 
manently. This means that treatment is indicated. 

This view, that child-analysis should be used sparingly, in 
cases where the hope for a spontaneous recovery is slight or 
non-existent, is opposed to the opinion which many analysts 
hold, that child-analysis might be used prophylactically, to 
remove the pathogenic fixation-points. 

3 . Neurotic Interference with Ego-Development 

The threat which the occurrence of an infantile neurosis 
constitutes for the libido development of the individual is so 
blatant that it has not escaped notice. The same danger is less 
obvious where the development of the ego is concerned. On 
the contrary, there is a common belief that neurotic develop- 
ment in children is coupled with an especially good, frequently 
an especially early, blossoming of this side of the child's person- 
ality. It is left an open question whether it is the infantile 
neurosis which, as one of its results, overemphasizes the side 
of the ego forces, or whether it is an early ripening of the 
ego which predisposes the child for a severe infantile neurosis. 

The following is an attempt to examine the questions whether 
a childhood neurosis helps or harms the building up of the ego; 
what the interactions are between the two processes ; and whether 
the degree of harm done to the ego can serve as a further in- 
dication for the therapeutic use of child-analysis. 



84 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

('a) The quantitative factor in Ego-Development 

A neurosis can affect the ego quantitatively, that is, in its 
strength. 

The term ego strength is not meant to denote an absolute 
quantity of ego forces which are, in themselves, not measure- 
able. It refers to the relative efficiency of the ego with regard 
to the contents of the id (the instincts) and to the forces of the 
environment with which the ego has to deal. This ego strength 
varies repeatedly in the course of normal development. In 
the beginning of life the instincts are of overwhelming strength 
and the first crystallisations of an ego are completely under 
their domination and at their service. The child's growing 
awareness of the outside world, the beginnings of its ability to 
retain and connect memory traces, to foresee events, to draw 
conclusions from them, etc., are used exclusively for the purpose 
of instinct gratification. The better the ego development of an 
infant, the better are its chances to gratify its desires and to use 
the outside world for the fulfilment of its wishes. This undis- 
puted reign of the instincts does not last longer than early 
infancy. As a result of its strong emotional ties to the parents, 
the child soon begins to regard their wishes, which are fre- 
quently in opposition to its own. To the degree in, which it is 
able to identify with the parents who educate it, its ego develops 
hostile attitudes towards its instincts and attempts to oppose 
and manage them. Simultaneously it begins to correlate con- 
flicting emotions and tendencies instead of giving alternate 
expression to them as has happened so far. This means sup- 
pressing on or the other side of them (love or hate, active or 
passive desires, etc.), and creates new conflicts between ego 
and id. But although all these efforts are made by the ego to 
assert itself against the instincts, no real ego superiority is 
established in the first period of childhood. The pull of wish- 
fulfilment is still too strong, and the principle which governs 
the child's life remains to a large extent the pleasure principle* 
It is only the final frustration of the Oedipus wishes, with the 
consequent fading out of the early libido organisations, which 
chahges the situation decisively in favour of ego strength, 
While the sex drives remain latent (latency period), the ego 
assumes superiority, directs the actions of the child, establishes 



INDICATIONS FOR CHILD ANALYSIS 85 

the reality principle, and effects the first real adaptation to the 
exigencies of the outside world. Ego and id have now reversed 
their positions. But the new order is by no means permanent, 
Ego superiority is overthrown again as soon as the first signs of 
adolescence appear. Because of the biological increase in pre- 
genital tendencies during pre-puberty, and genital tendencies 
during puberty, the libidinal forces rise in strength. During 
the "whole of adolescence ego forces and id forces struggle with 
each other for the upper hand, a combat which is responsible 
for many of the conflicting and abnormal manifestations of 
that period. It is impossible to predict before adolescence is 
over, whether the individual will emerge from this struggle 
with a strong or with a weak ego, but this uncertainty is normal 
and necessary. It is essential for the development of a rich and 
vivid personality that this part of character formation (the 
establishment of a definite proportion between id strength 
and ego strength) should not be terminated too early. The 
changing flow of libidinal development should, while it lasts, 
find scope for at least transitory expression without being too 
crippled by the dictates of a strong ego. On the other hand 
every new gain in the ego achievements should contribute 
something towards altering the balance between ego and id 
and mark a further step in perfecting a sensible management 
of the instincts. 1 The personality of the child will develop 
so long as the relationship between ego and id remains fluid and 
changeable. 

The incidence of an infantile neurosis acts like a calcification 
in the middle of a living organism. Every neurotic symptom 
represents an attempt at establishing an artificial balance 
between an instinctive wish and the repressive forces of the 
ego, a balance which is rigid and, once established, not open to 
correction. If symptoms multiply and the neurosis organises 
itself into a coherent structure, the whole relationship between 
ego and id becomes hopelessly paralysed. 

Another and more direct manner in which infantile neuroses 
reduce ego strength is due to the regression which occurs 

1 A little girl of four and a half, when asked to behave and control herself 
specially on a certain occasion in the absence of her nurse, answered sensibly, 
"I think I can manage." 

D 



86 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

invariably at the beginning of symptom formation. Libidinal, 
regression is always accompanied by a certain amount of ego 
regression; ego strength is to a degree dependent on the phase 
of libido development. The oral organisation of the libido, 
for instance, always goes together with a special urgency of 
wishes and impatience for wishful filment. That means, 
practically speaking, that a child who regresses from the 
genital to the oral level simultaneously regresses from ego 
strength to ego weakness. Or, to put it differently, regression 
from the genital to the oral level implies regression from the 
reality principle to the pleasure principle. 

The neurotic child may thus, at first glance, appear to possess 
a strong ego. But this appearance is misleading. Its ego is 
committed to a definite and not reversible attitude to an instinct, 
in order to maintain the delicate balance which is necessary for 
symptom formation. But its ego is in reality weaker than that 
of a normal child since the id forces have gained a more or less 
lasting victory in the disguise of symptom formation. 

(b) The qualitative factor in ego-development 

From the first months of life onward the ego develops from 
a mere meeting point for dimly perceived stimuli into an 
organised centre where impressions are received, sorted out, 
recorded, interpreted, and action is taken on the strength of 
them, (A separate part of the ego fulfils the task of supervising 
thoughts and actions from a moral point of view [super-ego].) 
The essential ego functions in this respect are: testing of inner 
and outer reality; building up of memory; the synthetic function of 
the ego; and ego control of motility. All through childhood a 
ripening process is at work which, in the service of an increas- 
ingly better knowledge of and adaptation to reality, aims at 
perfecting these functions, at rendering them more and more 
objective and independent of the emotions, until they can 
become as accurate and reliable as any non-human mechanical 
apparatus. In the last resort, an individual's efficiency in life 
(under less civilised conditions his chance of survival) is deter- 
mined by the perfection or imperfection of these ego functions. 

But simultaneously with this maturing process another, 
even more powerful, tendency is at work in the child. These 



INDICATIONS FOR CHILD ANALYSIS 87 

ego achievements are wholly acceptable to it so far as they 
serve instinct gratification and provide some mastery over the 
environment. But it soon becomes evident that this new way of 
functioning brings at least an equal, if not an overwhelmingly 
greater amount of pain, discomfort and anxiety. Each one of 
the new functions has its disagreeable consequences. The 
faithful testing and recording of outside reality reveals to" the 
ego the existence of countless alarming possibilities ; the outer 
world is. shown to b$ full of frustrations, disappointments, 
threats* The testing of the child's own inner reality reveals 
the existence of forbidden and dangerous tendencies which 
offend the child's conception of itself and therefore cause 
anxiety. The sorting out and interpreting of stimuli., as they 
arrive, leads to drawing a sharp line of distinction between the 
child's own self and the objects outside; before this faculty 
had been developed, the infant had been able to feel itself as 
one with the world around, to count as itself whatever was 
pleasurable, and to ascribe to an "outside" what was dis- 
pleasing. The development of the function of memory is equally 
disturbing, since it aims at retaining memory traces irrespective 
of their quality; the infant used to give preference to pleasant 
memories and to reject the painful ones. The synthetic function 
of the ego which aims at unifying and centralising all mental 
processes, is opposed to the free and easy manner in which the 
infant used to live out its most divergent emotions and instinc- 
tive urges either simultaneously or alternately, as for instance 
love its parents, and hate them, be a passive baby in need of 
comfort from its mother at one moment, only to confront her 
as an active male lover and protector the next moment; to 
destroy possessions, and then immediately afterwards violently 
to desire and to treasure them. Lastly, a strict ego control of 
motility permanently deprives the instinctive forces in the id 
of their former free expression. 

Strictly objective functioning of this nature heightens the 
feeling of tension and anxiety for the ego. On the one side the 
libidinal forces in the id, represented by the component 
instincts of infantile sexuality, are felt to clamour for satis- 
faction. On the other, the adults in the outside world are per- 
ceived to threaten punishment or loss.of love if the child should 



88 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

indulge in forbidden sexual or aggressive wishes and actions. 
From the side of the super-ego, i.e. from within, ..the ego is 
flooded with feelings of guilt and self criticism whenever it 
fails to live up to its own standards. 

The weak and immature ego of the child fails to stand up 
to the impact of these dangers. It consequently attempts to 
undo its own achievements as fast as they are made. It tries 
not to see outside reality as it is (Denmf}\ not to record and 
make conscious the representatives of the inner urges as they 
are sent up from the id (Repression}; it overlays unwelcome 
urges with their opposites (Reaction-Formation} ; it substitutes 
for painful facts pleasurable phantasies (escape into Fantasy- 
Life}\ it attributes to others the qualities which it does not 
like to see in itself (Projection} ; and it appropriates from them 
what seems welcome (Introjection), etc. 

Normally,, in every childhood, these methods are used in a 
moderate degree to defend the ego against anxiety. A certain 
retrograde movement in the development of the ego achieve- 
ments is therefore the rule. It does not more than create a 
certain amount of subjective and faulty functioning which is 
usually overcome with the beginning of the latency period 
when the position of the ego is strengthened and anxiety lessens. 

But events shape themselves differently where acute neurotic 
conflicts intervene either in the preoedipal phases or during 
the Oedipus phase. In the face of excessive anxiety the ego 
makes excessive and more lasting use of the defence mechan- 
isms at its disposal. Therefore the harm done to the ego func- 
tions becomes considerably greater and is of more permanent 
importance. 

Examples of the excessive use of the method of denial of outside 
reality can be found when the child is confronted with the facts of 
difference of the sexes, which give rise to penis envy and castration 
anxiety. Under the pressure of these painful emotions the ego waives 
reality testing^ pretends to see what is not there (for instance a penis 
on the mother), or ignores what is in plain view. (A little girl., on 
watching her new born brother's penis, said, with satisfaction, to her 
sister: "He has a belly-button just like us," thus remarking on their 
similarity instead of admitting the obvious difference between them.) 
Denial makes still greater inroads on reality testing where the central 



INDICATIONS FOR CHILD ANALYSIS 89 

subject of observation of parental intercourse is concerned. Under 
the influence of their oedipal jealousy children, will refuse to realise 
that their parents have a sex life with each other, and will uphold this 
denial in spite of all other advances in knowledge of biological facts, 
of propagation among animals, and even of the facts of life where they 
concern strangers. Evidence of such denial can be found in countless 
fairy tales, myths, religious beliefs, etc. Under neurotic conditions it 
frequently outlives the latency period, and adolescence and continues 
into adult life. But even normally, so long as children avoid admitting 
reality in this all important respect, they are not free to use their full 
intelligence for becoming acquainted with outside reality. (An adult 
neurotic, by profession a medical man, began his analytic cure with 
the following words: "My parents never had anything to do with each 
other," Since he was a child in an interminable row of brothers and 
sisters, there was evidently no truth in his statement. But it contained 
the key to his neurotic and bizarre behaviour which, to a degree, 
made his dealings with the real world unpredictable and unreliable.) 

Examples of excessive use of the method of repression are, by now, 
common knowledge. Repression occurs invariably when a young 
child finds itself faced with the intolerable frustration of the component 
instincts of his early instinctive life. It is easier for the child to stand 
the clamouring for satisfaction which comes from the id when the 
representatives of the instincts are refused admittance into conscious- 
ness, i.e. are repressed. Since all instinctive manifestations are inter- 
related, such repression draws ever widening circles until ego and id 
become entirely estranged from each other. What the neurotic child 
knows about its own inner life is frequently negligible, at best it is 
scanty and faulty. Awareness of inner reality cannot be upheld under 
these conditions. 

The most instructive instance of neurotic defence doing harm, to an 
ego function is the complete obliteration of childhood memories due 
to repression. To uphold belief in the asexuality of the parents, or to 
blot out coitus observations, or scenes of seduction, etc., the memory 
traces of whole periods of life are removed from consciousness, thus 
damaging the objectivity of the function of memory, and disrupting 
and disconnecting the individual's relationship to his own past. Norm- 
ally all children remove the traces of their earliest years in this manner, 
to spare themselves the memory of their primitively aggressive, and 
crudely sexual infantile reactions; but this infantile amnesia should 
not cover more than the first years of life. (A neurotic young girl was 
able to remember most of her past childhood, with the exception of 
two years during the latency period, the memory traces of which were 



90 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

completely absent. Her analysis revealed that during this period her 
widowed mother had been "unfaithful*' to her dead father, a fact which 
the child was trying to ignore.) 

Excessive use of projection is usually made by neurotic children 
when dealing with their hostile feelings against father or mother. 
They either ascribe these tendencies to the parents themselves, or to 
another child, or to an animal, etc. When used in a normal degree 
this defence method is an important transitory help in the development 
of the personality. Used excessively it once more blurs the newly-made 
distinction between the child itself and the world outside. (A child of 
two and a half was subject to violent tempers directed against her 
mother substitute, would shout, throw things at her, etc. When .she 
began to make attempts to overcome these tantrums, she suddenly 
got hold of the push horse of the nursery, rushed it against the nurse, 
shouting: "Naughty Jane, jiji bite you now." When the nurse said, 
"Oh, no, the horse will not bite me, it is not cross with me, but you 
are," the child laughed and said: "No, me not cross, only jiji.". 
Similarly children ascribe their bad feelings to the "big bad wolf", or 
some other outside agency, with the result that they themselves can 
feel all "good" and loving. 

Another defence method for dealing with the negative side of the 
child's ambivalence against the parents is the splitting of the personality^ 
with the resulting damage for the synthetic function of the ego. For 
certain periods many children go so far as inventing special names 
for their "good" and their "bad" selves, though normally they retain 
the knowledge that both, the good and the bad child are themselves, 
with a vague feeling of responsibility remaining for both. In an out- 
standing case of this kind, a girl of six used to refer to her bad side con- 
sistently as "the devil" and had ceased to feel any conscious respon- 
sibility for the devil's thoughts or actions. 

One of the most important advances in ego development during 
early childhood is the control of actions by the ego itself. This is with- 
drawn when too many actions become invested with symbolical 
sexual or "aggressive significance. The ego then tries first to inhibit 
them and if unsuccessful, withdraws from certain forms of activity 
altogether, leaving the control of motility in these respects to the forces 
of the id. The child then presents a picture, partly of inhibitions , partly 
of unreliable, unpredictable, functioning, which is not adapted to 
reality. (A little girl of three was hardly able to use her hands for any 
sensible occupation. She used to stretch them out in front of her, lifted 
up as if warding off actions, her fingers spread wide apart. In this 
manner she kept herself from committing the aggressions against her 



INDICATIONS FOR CHILD ANALYSIS v 91 

little companions with which her mind was constantly occupied in 
fantasy, Many boys arc greatly disturbed in their urinary function 
by guilt feelings which arise when they have to touch their genital. 
They withdraw from this function because for them it implies the wish 
to masturbate. A boy of eight was unable to use a knife at table, since 
he had the fantasy of cutting his mother with it; but withdrawing 
from this action was of little help since his aggressive wishes dominated 
other activities., for instance when he was holding a stick, etc., which 
then from sensible actions suddenly changed into passionate attacks on 
his mother, etc. 

The common escape into fantasy which is of the greatest help to 
every child, is used excessively under the pressure of neurotic conflicts, 
and can then become the basis for a complete withdrawal and estrange- 
ment from the real world and its demands. 

*t 

This interference with the ego functions is of greater im- 
portance in childhood than it will be, under otherwise similar 
conditions, in the adult neurosis. It occurs while the ripening 
process of the ego is still in action. The function which is 
most directly attacked by the infantile neurosis will, at least 
temporarily, be kept back from further development, while 
the other ego achievements continue to mature. Accordingly 
ego development will become onesided and unharmonious. 

The particular defence mechanism which will be most in 
use, and the particular ego damage which will occur as its 
consequence, depends on the type of infantile neurosis con- 
cerned. In the various forms of hysterical neurosis anxiety is 
warded off with the predominant help of repression. This 
may account for the fact that children of the hysterical type, 
frequently possess a faulty and unreliable memory with conse- 
quent difficulties in studying; damage to the function of 
memory has spread further than the emotionally dangerous 
memories with which the ego tried to interfere. Obsessional 
children usually have an excellent and undisturbed memory; 
but, owing to the excessive ego interference with . the free 
expression of their anal-sadistic tendencies, they are estranged 
from their own emotions, and are considered cold and un- 
responsive, even where other than these primitive aggressive- 
sexual manifestations are concerned. Phobic children deal 
with their anxieties by withdrawal from their danger-points. 



92 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

They tend to withdraw from many forms of activity altogether 
and give up motility, far beyond the original range of neurotic 
danger. As a consequence they frequently become altogether 
retiring and clumsy in their actions, with passionate and un- 
predictable outbreaks whenever the motility is governed by 
the id forces instead of the ego. 

With this point of view in mind, it may be possible to assess 
the seriousness of an infantile neurosis, and with it the need 
for treatment,, in an indirect way, through the harm done to 
the ego functions by the extensive use of one or several of the 
neurotic defence mechanisms. There is no reason for alarm 
or interference when one or another of the ego achievements 
are reduced, or retarded in their development, or temporarily 
put out of action. This is a normal and inevitable occurrence. 
But such retardations may become lasting; several, or all, of 
the important ego functions may be severely attacked at the 
same time. If a child shows a faulty knowledge of the outer 
world, far below the level of its intelligence, if it is seriously 
estranged from its own emotions; with blank spaces in the 
remembrance of its own past, beyond the usual range of infan- 
tile- amnesia; with a split in its personality; and with motility 
out of ego control; then there can be little doubt that the 
neurosis is severe, and that it is high time to take therapeutic 
action. 



CONCLUSION 

In the foregoing pages an attempt is made to find indications 
for the therapeutic use of child analysis not so much in the 
neurotic manifestations themselves, as in the bearing of these 
manifestations on the ripening processes within the individual 
child. Emphasis is shifted thereby from the purely clinical 
aspects of a case to the developmental aspect. 

When diagnosing cases from this point of view, the child 
analyst, or child psychiatrist, has to be as intimately familiar 
with the normal sequence of child development as he is familiar 
with the neurotic or psychotic disturbances of it. He is, really^ 
faced with the task of judging the normality of the develop- 
mental process itself. 



INDICATIONS FOR CHILD ANALYSIS 03- 

It is an open question how much help diagnosis of this kind 
can receive from academic psychology. The various mental 
tests, so far devised, assess circumscribed aspects of ego develop- 
ment; they are nearly indispensable in cases where a differential 
diagnosis between mental defectiveness and defective aware- 
ness of reality through excessive denial has to be made. The 
Rohrschach test goes further into inquiring into the state of 
libido development and its disturbances. Other tests try to 
disclose the phantasy life of the individual. It is to be expected 
that in time further mechanised methods will be devised to- 
cover an increasingly wider range of the factors on which a 
satisfactory diagnosis of infantile neuroses can be based. 

At present our analytical knowledge about the develop- 
mental processes on the libido as well as on the ego side is still 
very incomplete in itself. Besides, too little is known about the 
interactions between them, beyond the fact that a precocious 
ego is especially intolerant when coupled with the primitive 
pregenital component instincts. We are only slowly learning to 
distinguish the various characteristics which mark a neurotic 
disturbance as either transitory or as permanent, although this 
distinction is of extreme importance for our diagnoses. Not 
enough is known about the relation between the development 
of the purely intellectual factors and the other important func- 
tions of the ego, etc. 

Until these gaps are filled by more clinical data from the 
psycho-analytical investigation of single children, it will be 
necessary not to confine examinations to short-cuts of any kind, 
helpful as they may be in furnishing additional data, but to 
adhere to the former, lengthy, laborious, and groping methods 
of individual approach. 



BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Abbreviations 

Psa.Q. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly^ New York. 

J.Psa. International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 

Z.Psff. Internationale Zeitschrift fuer Psychoanalyse. 

Z.pstf.P. Zeitschrift fuer psychoanalytische Paedagogtk. 
j4. J. Orthops. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 

Psa.R. Psychoanalytic Review. 

s (i) Anna Freud, "Einfuehrung in die Technik der Kinderanalyse", 
Internat.^Psychoanalyt. Verlag, Vienna, 1927. 

( 2 ) - , "On the Theory of the Analysis of Children", J.Psa., 

X, 1929. 

(3) "The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child", an Annual Vol., I, New 

York, and Imago Publ. Co., London, 1946. 

(4) Anna Freud, "Introduction to the Technique of Child- Analysis", 

Nervous and Mental Disease Monograph Series No, 48, 1929. 

(5) Melanie Klein, "The Psycho- Analysis of Children", The Internat. 

Psycho- Analytical Library, No. 22, 1932. 

(6) "Symposion on Child-Analysis", J.Psa. 9 VIII, 1927. 

(7) Bcrta Bornstein, "Zur Psychogenese der Pseudodebilitaet", Z.Psa., 

XVI, 1930. 

gj - 5 "Bezichung zwischen Sexual- und Intellektentwick- 
lung", Z.psa.P., IV, 1930. 

7 "Enuresis und Kleptomanie als passageres Symptom", 



Z.psa.P., VIII, 1934- 

5 "Phobia in a Two-and-a-half year-old Child", Psa.Q., 



IV, 1935- 
( u ) - 5 "Leugnung durch die Phantasie", Z.psa.P. y X, 1936. 

(12) StefF Bornstein, "Eine Technik der Kinderanalyse bei Kindern 

mit Lernhemmungen", Z.psa.P., VIII, 1934. 

( 13 ) - , "A Child Analysis", Psa.Q., IV, 1935. 

(14) Dorothy Burlingham, "Child Analysis and the Mother", Psa.Q., 

IV, 1935. 

(15) _ - ^ "Phantasie und Wirklichkeit in einer Kinderanalyse", 

Z.Psa.> XXIV, 1939. 



96 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 

(16) Edith Buxbaum, "Exhibitionistic Onanism in a Ten-year-old 
P.MV, 1935. 
5 "The Role of Detective Stones in a Child Analysis 77 , 



(18) Margaret E. Fries, "Play Technique in the Analysis of Young 

Children 7 ', Psa.R., XXIV, 1932. 

(19) Elizabeth R. Gelcerd, "The Analysis of a Case of Compulsive 

Masturbation in a Child", Psa.Q., XII, 1943. 

(20) Wilhclm Hoffer, "Bericht ucber die Einleitung eincr Kinder- 

analyse", Z.psa.P., IX, 1935. 

(21) Anny Katan-Angel, "From the Analysis of a Bed- Wetter", Ps&.Q., 

IV, 1935.^ 

(22) Marianne Kris, "Kin MaerchenstofF in einer Kindcnmalyse' 1 , 

Z.psa.P.,VI, 1932. 

(23) Estelle Levy, "Psychoanalytic Treatment of a Child with a Stealing 

Compulsion", Jt.J.Orthops., IV, 1934. 

(24) Kata Levy, "Vom Bettnaessen des Kindes", Z.psa.P., VIII, 1934. 

(25) Anna Maenchen, "Denkheminung und Aggression", Z.psa.P., 

X, 1936. 

(26) Editha Sterha, u An Abnormal Child 77 , Psa.Q.> V, 1936. 

27) - , "Excerpt from the Analysis of a Dog Phobia 71 , Pw.Q., 

IV, 1935- ...... ' 

(28) - , "Aus der Analyse eines Zweijaehrigen", Z.psa.P. 9 

VIII, J934- 

(29) - , "Ein Fall von Esstoerung", Z.psa.P.^ IX, 1935. 

(30) Jenny Waeldcr, "Analyse eines Falles von Pavor Nocturnus 11 . 
' Z.p M .P., IX, 1935- 

(31) August Aichhorn, "Wayward Youth 1 ', Putnam, London^ 1936, 
(22) - , "Er/jehungsberatung", Z.psa.P., VI, 1932, 

j "Zur Technik der Er/.ielumgsberatung", Z.psn.P., 
X,i 9 36. _ 

, "The Juvenile Court; Is it a Solution?" Revue Inter- 
nationale de 1 'Enfant, Vol. IX, No. 51, March, 1930. 
(35) Alice Balint, "Die Psychoanalyse des Kinderzimmers", Z.psa.P,, 
VI, 1932. 

, "Versagen und Gewaehren in der Er/jehung", Z.psa.P. 9 
X, 1936. 

3 u Die Grundlagen unseres Erxiehungssystems", Z.psa.P., 



_X, 1937. 

(38) Th. Bergmann, "Versuch der Behebung einer Eraichungs- 

schwierigkeit", Z.psa.P., XI, 1937. 

(39) Siegfried Bernfeld, "Kinderheim Baumgarten", Juedischer Verlag, 

Berlin, 1922. 



(40) - , "Sisyphos oder die Grenzen der Erziehung", Internat. 
Psyehoanalyt. Verlag, Vienna, 1925. 



BIBLIOGRAPHY 97 

at. 

? "Psychology of the Infant", Kegan Paul, London, 
1929, 

(42) ---------- -, "Ucber die einfachc maennliche Pubertaet", Z.psa.P., 

IX, 1935. 

(43) Stcff Bornstein, u Missvcrstacndnisse in der psychoanalytischen 

Paedugogik", Z.psa.P,, XI, 1937. 

(44) Edith Braim, "Eine Kinderfreundschaft. Beobachtung aus einem 

Kindergarten", Z.psa.P., X, 1936. 

(45) Marie H. Briehl, "Die Rollc dcs Maerchens in der Kleinkinder- 

eraelumg", Z.psa.P., XI, 1937. 

(46) Dorothy Burlingham, u Probleme des psychoanalytischen Erzie- 

hers", Z.psa.P., XI, 1937. 

(47) Edith Buxbaum, "Massenpsychologic und Schule", Z.psa.P., X, 

1936. 

(48) H. Fischer, u Schnsucht und Selbstbefriedigung", Z,ps*.P., VII, 

933- 

(49) H, Fischer and Lilie Peller, u Eingewoehnungsschwierigkeiten im 

Kindergarten", Z.psa.P., VIII, 1934. 

(50) Anna Freud, "Introduction to Psycho- Analysis for Teachers" 

George Allen & Unwin, Ltd., London, 1931. 

(51) Herta Fuchs, 'Tsychoanalytische Heilpaedagogik im Kinder- 

garten", Z.psa.P., VI, 1932. 

(52)' - , "Probleme der heilpaedagogischen Kindergarten- 
gruppen'"', Z.psa.P., VII, 1933. 

(53) ^ ri ^ Homburger, "Psychoanalysis and the Future of Education", 

PM.Q., IV, 1935. 

(54) Alice Landau, "Angsterlebnisse eines Dreijaehrigen", Z.psa.P., 

X, ^936. 

(55) Emmi Minor-Zaruba, "Die fuenfjaehrige Nora im Kinder- 

garten", Z.psa.P.j XI, 1937. 

(56) K. Pensimus, "A Rejected Child", Psa.Q., IV, 1935. 
(5 7 j - ? "Folgen der Entrechtung", Z.psa.P., VII, 1933. 

(58) Emma Plank-Spira, a Eine Einschlafstoerung aus Todesangst", 

Z.psa.P.,Xl, 1937. 

(59) Ann! Poertl, "Profound Disturbances in the Nutritional and 

Excretory Habits of a Four and One-half Year Old Boy: Their 
Analytic Treatment in a School Setting", Psa.Q., IV, 1935. 

9 "Verspaetete Reinlichkeitsgewoehnung", Z.psa.P., 

VII, 1933. 
(61) Fritz Redl, a Zum Begriff der 'Lernstoerung 7 ", Z.psa.P., VIII, 

1934, 



98 THE PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF CHILDREN" 

(62) Fritz Redl, "Gedanken ueber die Wirkung ciner Phimose- 
operation", Z.psa.P,, VIII, 1934. 

, "Der Mechanismus der Strafwirkung", Z.psa.P., IX, 



(64) M. Schmaus, "Bravhcit und neurotische Hemmung", Z.psa.P.,, 

vn, 1933- 

(65) - , "Esstoerung und Verstimmung", Z.psa.P., X, 1936. 

(66) Editha Sterba, "Verbot und AuiFordcrung", Z.psa.P., VIII, 1934. 

(67) - 5 "Zwei Artcn der Abwehr", Z.psa.P., X, 1936. 

(68) - 3 "Schulc und Erziehungsbcratung", Z.psa.P.> X, 1936. 

(69) Dorothy Burlingham and Anna Freud, a Young Children in War- 
, Time", George Allen & Unwin, Ltd., for the New Era, London, 

1942. 

(70) - ! - , "Infants without Families", George Allen & Unwin, 

Ltd., London, 1943. 

(71) Anna Freud, "The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence", The 

International Psycho- Analytical Library, No. 30, London. 
1937, original German edition, 1936. 

(72) Berta Bornstein, "Clinical Notes on Child Analysis", The Psycho- 

Analytic Study of the Child, Vol. I, New York, 1945, London. 
1946. 

(73) N. W. Wulff, "Phobic bei einem andcrthalbjaehrigen Kinde". 

Z.Psa., XIII, 1927. 

(74) S. Freud, "Analysis of a Phobia in a Five-Year-Old Boy", 

Collected Papers., Ill, Hogarth Press, London. 

? "Three Contributions to the Theory of Sex", Nervous 
and Mental Disease Monograph Series 7. 




CHISW1CK PRESS 




124220